McCain is Taking $58,000 in Disability ? (votes, campaign, Democrats, border)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
John McCain, who is refusing to vote for the GI Bill for our troops because "it's too generous," is himself getting $58,000 a year, tax-free, from the US government for his military service. Had McCain been getting that amount every year since Vietnam, that would total $2,000,000 for the man who isn't into overgenerous government.
McCain campaign strategist Mark Salter said Monday night that McCain was technically disabled. "Tortured for his country .. that is how he acquired his disability," Salter said.
Technically? What does that mean? Usually, it means that under the strict reading of the law, you're covered, but in fact it's kind of a nudge-nudge-wink-wink situation - that's what "technically" means. It's called parsing, which is something you do to "technically" claim something is true, when on its face it really isn't. So is McCain "technically" disabled, and taking $58,000 a year tax free from the government, or is he actually disabled? I would imagine there are other solders who are actually disabled who could use the money. And if he is actually disabled, just how disabled is he?
I'm not gonna spend the time to look up all of the issues, but the man can not raise his arms above his head because his shoulders were broken, and the melanoma that he had was most likely from the severe sun burns that he received while being left outswide for extensive periods of time as a POW.
And, once again, he has no issue with giving generously to the troops. He does, however, take issue with providing them with incentives to not re-enlist.
Last edited by trzlucky; 06-09-2008 at 07:40 AM..
Reason: grammer
Well, he probably has not received that amount from the beginning since there is a raise in disablility benefits annually due to cost of living, dependents being added or removed also changed the amount. Yes, he is most likely entitled to this disability and many other veterans are and receive it. That is an unbelievable amount and for someone who does not really need the money it seems rediculous. But it is a benefit that is not just given away and they rate your disability with caution. There are a lot of veterans, more then you know that receive these benefits at different ratings which pay out different amounts depending on your percentage of disability. A service connected disability is something that a veteran should be compensated for since they were serving our country. It has nothing to do with the GI bill and these are two completely different subjects. However, the GI bill is very important as well.
I am NOT a McCain fan at all, but he is truly a disabled veteran and if that is the compensation that he has earned for his service to the country, so be it.
That being said, EVERY service member who was disabled in service to our country also deserves compensation and treatment and currently, the VA plays games during the application process. They take so long and provide such confusing instruction to our veterans that sometimes, they just give up and stop seeking the benefits they deserve. My son has returned from the gulf with MINOR disabilities and the games played border on criminal. For example, letting him know 48 hours before an appointment that he must keep, causing him to request yet another day off from work, travel over an hour to get to the VA clinic, only to get there to answer four verbal questions that he could have answered over the phone! This is the game they play to weed out vets who will just drop out and not pursue what they have earned and it's shameful.
ANY veteran who is disabled in service, even John McCain, deserves benefits and care. I hope McCain's refusal to support the G.I. Bill is remembered by everyone who ever wore the uniform - or knows someone who did - and votes!
John McCain, who is refusing to vote for the GI Bill for our troops because "it's too generous," is himself getting $58,000 a year, tax-free, from the US government for his military service. Had McCain been getting that amount every year since Vietnam, that would total $2,000,000 for the man who isn't into overgenerous government.
McCain campaign strategist Mark Salter said Monday night that McCain was technically disabled. "Tortured for his country .. that is how he acquired his disability," Salter said.
Technically? What does that mean? Usually, it means that under the strict reading of the law, you're covered, but in fact it's kind of a nudge-nudge-wink-wink situation - that's what "technically" means. It's called parsing, which is something you do to "technically" claim something is true, when on its face it really isn't. So is McCain "technically" disabled, and taking $58,000 a year tax free from the government, or is he actually disabled? I would imagine there are other solders who are actually disabled who could use the money. And if he is actually disabled, just how disabled is he?
Are you trying to argue that he's not disabled? Are you trying to say that even if he is, that he's not entitled to benefits that Democrats are entitled to? Is McCain getting any special treatment and payment that other military personal is receiving? Or is the point of your story, that McCain thinks that $58,000 a year is to generous, because if military personal who become disabled receive over $50,000 a year in payment, and the GI Bill calls for even more, I'd say thats pretty generous.
Thanks for reminding me again about how great of an american McCain is.
I have no problem with an honorably discharged veteran receiving disability. No problem at all. They did what their government asked of them; they were injured because of it; and it's owed to them.
That said, it's fair to ask whether Senator McCain's benefits are greater than others' due to his prominence and stature.
I'm not saying it's fair that a guy who earned $405K in 2007, that he should be accepting or not accepting this $58K. Maybe he sets it aside to do good works for veterans. Or not, it's his money and his business. Maybe someone will ask him about it during a town hall meeting.
I have no problem with an honorably discharged veteran receiving disability. No problem at all. They did what their government asked of them; they were injured because of it; and it's owed to them.
That said, it's fair to ask whether Senator McCain's benefits are greater than others' due to his prominence and stature.
If he has been receiving these benefits since the 70's depending on his percentage of disability, he most definately could be receiving that amount and it is not due to his stature. That should give you an idea of what the expense is for our government to pay out in disability.
If anything, it points out a problem with the military payment plan. Should soemone who earned $400K a year, be allowed or entitled to collect disability from the military? Individuals on SSI cant go get a job and earn $400K a year, even if they are disabled, why should members of the military be any different?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.