U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply Start New Thread
 
Unread 06-24-2008, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,047 posts, read 7,410,424 times
Reputation: 1361
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJickler View Post
Everyone knows the 9/11 Commission Report has a liberal bias.
LOL

http://www.tinfoilhatparty.org/images/tinfoil-hat.jpg (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 06-24-2008, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Somewhere East of Laramie
27,027 posts, read 15,809,938 times
Reputation: 11096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunshine Chick View Post
We are already under attack by terrorists who want to destroy America !!

IT'S CALLED ---- LIBERALISM --------


Oh Nooooooooooooooo!

Lock up the children!

Mothers, hide your daughters!

Check under those beds at night!

There are people about who actually believe the Constitution to be more than mere suggestions!

Danger! Danger! Danger!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2008, 12:13 PM
 
1,117 posts, read 1,581,791 times
Reputation: 538
at least he's sincere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2008, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,214 posts, read 21,958,030 times
Reputation: 6975
Quote:
Try the 9/11 Commission Report for that FACT.
Where in the report? Please cite the relevant passage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2008, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,214 posts, read 21,958,030 times
Reputation: 6975
I don't see what the big deal is. Black is not "wishing" for a terrorist attack. But if one were to occur, there is NO DOUBT that would benefit McCain.

Truth hurts, I know. Fact it, Obamatons; The dems/libs are WEAK, WEAK, WEAK on foreign policy and the electorate knows it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2008, 01:00 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
10,522 posts, read 10,129,623 times
Reputation: 2598
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Where in the report? Please cite the relevant passage.
Al Qaeda-Hussein Link Is Dismissed (washingtonpost.com)
CNN.com - 9/11 panel stands by finding on al Qaeda, Iraq - Jul 6, 2004


National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
Section 10.3
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2008, 01:09 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,047 posts, read 7,410,424 times
Reputation: 1361
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
I don't see what the big deal is. Black is not "wishing" for a terrorist attack. But if one were to occur, there is NO DOUBT that would benefit McCain.
The right winged newspaper The Economist disagrees. They see it as two possible scenarios, one of which includes anger at the current administration for bankrupting us and still not being able to stop a terrorist attack. The current administration is coupled with McCain, and there's no getting around that.

By "buying" our supposed safety, the Bush/McCain team (yes, they're a team whether you like it or not) has gambled big time on not getting attacked. If we ran up huge deficits on military spending and still were not able to prevent another 9/11, I would certainly be angry at them as would other individuals, conservative or liberal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2008, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,214 posts, read 21,958,030 times
Reputation: 6975
I refer you to page 66 of the 9/11 commission report.

There was no "collaborative operational relationship", but there were ties and contacts.

Of course the papers just used that pull-quote of "no collaborative relationship". Dig a little deeper.

Please cite the relevant passage/section about Cheney.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2008, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,214 posts, read 21,958,030 times
Reputation: 6975
Quote:
By "buying" our supposed safety, the Bush/McCain team (yes, they're a team whether you like it or not) has gambled big time on not getting attacked.
Sorry. The concensus directly AFTER 9/11 was that we WOULD be attacked again. It is amazing that we have not. It's not luck. It's "W"'s policies and aggressive OFFENSIVE stance against the terrorists.

He has united the world's intelligence agencies, he has kept these murderous thugs too busy trying to stay alive than plotting another attack, although they have tried.

You can thank "W" that we haven't been attacked again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2008, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,214 posts, read 21,958,030 times
Reputation: 6975
BTW, I never thought Saddam was involved in 9/11.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $74,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top