Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-23-2008, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Austin
4,105 posts, read 8,286,495 times
Reputation: 2134

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Um, it's called EDITING. McCain's interview was 14 minutes. How long was obama's. Of course they don't show the whole thing.
All interviews are edited, but did they post an answer from Obama onto a separate, unrelated question from Katie Couric to make him look better? This is the issue--not run of the mill editing, and I have never seen an interview conducted or broadcast this way before.

Sane, calm responses without name-calling please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-23-2008, 02:36 PM
 
Location: San Antonio North
4,147 posts, read 7,999,782 times
Reputation: 1010
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdiddy View Post
Color me skeptical (which I understand to be a lighter shade of Muslim), but I feel like we would have heard about such an incident from a few of our level-headed, well-informed conservative posters.

I guess the silence on this thread is due to those same posters trying to figure out how FLAMING LIBRUL Katie Couric would do such a thing for John McCain, a man whom we all know has always had a difficult time getting his point of view out into the mainstream media.

Donuts anyone? I put sprinkles on it just for you.
Gee can I have a sec this is not everyones life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2008, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Chicago
4,688 posts, read 10,102,964 times
Reputation: 3207
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryneone View Post
Gee can I have a sec this is not everyones life.
You have over 3,000 posts and average 10 posts a day. It may not be everyone's life, but it certainly is yours.

So get on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2008, 02:47 PM
 
Location: San Antonio North
4,147 posts, read 7,999,782 times
Reputation: 1010
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdiddy View Post
You have over 3,000 posts and average 10 posts a day. It may not be everyone's life, but it certainly is yours.

So get on it.
Go look into the San Antonio area We actually have a tight knit group that plays over there. It take two minutes to get those ten.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2008, 04:30 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,929,215 times
Reputation: 7118
Gateway Pundit

Here you go - from the Obama-loving MSNBC.

I guess Obermann is now too stupid to be on TV?

Right on Joe
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2008, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Austin
4,105 posts, read 8,286,495 times
Reputation: 2134
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Gateway Pundit

Here you go - from the Obama-loving MSNBC.

I guess Obermann is now too stupid to be on TV?

Right on Joe
Hmm.. Joe Scarborough calling people stupid doesn't tell me that CBS mixed and matched Obama's answers to Katie's completely different questions to make him look good, which is what I was asking happened.

Last edited by brattpowered; 07-23-2008 at 07:32 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2008, 07:38 PM
 
Location: South Florida
956 posts, read 1,234,464 times
Reputation: 321
Any twist and spin that Keith Oberman (sp?) puts on any "story" is not worth the time it takes to put him on the air to begin with. I watched this clip with my head spinning. What a jerk.

I was blown away this morning when even Harold Ford (D) supported Joe Scarborough's assertion that this was all a non-issue and merely a cover-up so people wouldn't talk about Barack's stubborn stand about the surge even at a time when both sides are now acknowledging its success.

Frankly it scares me, and it should scare everyone, that Mr. Obama cannot even today admit that the surge has worked, that he wouldn't have been able to stand on Iraqi soil without it, and that on this particular issue at least he was wrong.

Bur Mr. Obama can't admit he's wrong about anything. Isn't this the very trait that so many Democrats criticized Bush for? A leader has to be willing and able to accept that perhaps, just maybe, they they were wrong in their approach and shift their position.

Barack, perhaps because of his youth or his arrogance or perhaps just his inexperience, simply can't do that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2008, 07:52 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,929,215 times
Reputation: 7118
His denial makes him look like a total fool. His discounting of our troops in the surge as a "secondary" factor to success makes him look really, really bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2008, 08:25 PM
 
Location: Austin
4,105 posts, read 8,286,495 times
Reputation: 2134
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
His denial makes him look like a total fool. His discounting of our troops in the surge as a "secondary" factor to success makes him look really, really bad.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he explicitly credit the troops during the interview for reducing the violence in Iraq?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top