U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 08-06-2008, 06:53 AM
 
Location: Omaha
1,137 posts, read 1,209,289 times
Reputation: 308
Quote:
Originally Posted by fopt65 View Post
Obama's plan is flawed in that currently we don't have the technology to make the solar/wind energy as efficient and reliable as needed to make it such a significant part of our energy system.

Until that time comes, we will need to use oil, coal, nuclear and whatever else we can to supplement the alternative energy forms.
well, I simply have my own opinion, that when he's putting people to work building these windmills and solar panels, R&D are a part of the equation. I think starting down Obama's road would put us on the right track if nothing else, whereas McCain's plan has the potential to bring us back to this arguement someday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 08-06-2008, 07:25 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,666 posts, read 1,926,438 times
Reputation: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soccersupporter View Post
I agree, all those people falling for his explanation about his stupid comment equivocating tire pressure to finding new oil reserves are pretty ignorant. So what is the main steam media's excuse?
Arrogance -- they believe they are the only ones bright enough to understand how tire pressure effects gas mileage. Now if you combine arrogance with a cult like mentality, it brings into focus most of Barry's followers here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-06-2008, 08:02 AM
 
20,085 posts, read 14,079,628 times
Reputation: 3872
Quote:
Originally Posted by LNTT_Vacationer View Post
Arrogance -- they believe they are the only ones bright enough to understand how tire pressure effects gas mileage. Now if you combine arrogance with a cult like mentality, it brings into focus most of Barry's followers here.
They understand the concept of demand destruction and how the ultimate solution is dependent on reducing demand and not just increasing supply. Go back to your Samuelson university econ 101 textbook and review the section on supply/demand and the relationship of to price. Increased supply and decreased demand in tandem work best to reduce cost. It is basic academics.

Amazon.com: Economics: The Original 1948 Edition: Paul A. Samuelson: Books
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-06-2008, 08:07 AM
 
3,553 posts, read 3,020,281 times
Reputation: 1275
So then why won't the Dems let the market work as you so eloquently describe here? How would a windfall tax enter into this equation? What would its effect be on prices?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-06-2008, 08:14 AM
 
20,085 posts, read 14,079,628 times
Reputation: 3872
Quote:
Originally Posted by fopt65 View Post
So then why won't the Dems let the market work as you so eloquently describe here? How would a windfall tax enter into this equation? What would its effect be on prices?
I agree with you on the windfall profit and have posted such in the forum.

However on the topic of demand destruction:
Banking On Demand Destruction - Forbes.com

"How can you make good news out of bad news? The answer is demand destruction. With regard to record prices for a barrel of crude and a gallon of gas, demand destruction refers to drivers not driving, planes not flying, trucks not trucking and the hit to disposable income from the pain being suffered by consumers everywhere".

Sustained high prices from a economic perpective might be very helpful in the long run. However no politician is going to say that. The only way for this to work long term is to reduce world wide demand in the long term to allow increased production to catch up and exceed demand long term. Every little bit helps and counts. It is like health care insurance, for that to work we need individuals to live healthier life styles to reduce demand for services. Proper tire inflation is something individuals can do to help share in reducing demand long term. It is only logical and I find the negative reaction both comical and sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-06-2008, 09:05 AM
 
25,447 posts, read 14,792,984 times
Reputation: 3218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art123 View Post
"It's like these guys take pride in being ignorant."


YouTube Clip

"And if everybody in America inflated their tires to the proper level we would actually PROBABLY save more oil than JM drilling right below his feet there"


He still has it stuck in his head that everyone in America is ignorant and doesn't already do this.....he is assuming our total oil consumption would be reduced by 3-4%.....well that sounds nice and all but that 3-4% is gas mileage savings for one person....if one assumes everyone in America is stupid and doesn't already do this the maximum we could save by doing this is 3-4% of gas we use.

This is why I say lawyers wouldn't make good mechanics...if only half of the people in America aren't ignorant and already do this to their tires...then the max we could save would be 1.5-2%.....if more thna half do it already then there is virtually no savings.

That's why lawyers should let the experts speak about things like mechanics and he should just stick with law.


Yet he claims republicans are ignorant....what he is really saying that all Americans are ignorant with his assumptions.

Last edited by BigJon3475; 08-06-2008 at 09:53 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-06-2008, 09:07 AM
 
25,447 posts, read 14,792,984 times
Reputation: 3218
Quote:
Originally Posted by fopt65 View Post
Obama's plan is flawed in that currently we don't have the technology to make the solar/wind energy as efficient and reliable as needed to make it such a significant part of our energy system.

Until that time comes, we will need to use oil, coal, nuclear and whatever else we can to supplement the alternative energy forms.

He doesn't even support some of those....So he already crippled his energy plan right from the get go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-06-2008, 09:24 AM
 
25,447 posts, read 14,792,984 times
Reputation: 3218
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
I agree with you on the windfall profit and have posted such in the forum.

However on the topic of demand destruction:
Banking On Demand Destruction - Forbes.com

"How can you make good news out of bad news? The answer is demand destruction. With regard to record prices for a barrel of crude and a gallon of gas, demand destruction refers to drivers not driving, planes not flying, trucks not trucking and the hit to disposable income from the pain being suffered by consumers everywhere".

Sustained high prices from a economic perpective might be very helpful in the long run. However no politician is going to say that. The only way for this to work long term is to reduce world wide demand in the long term to allow increased production to catch up and exceed demand long term. Every little bit helps and counts. It is like health care insurance, for that to work we need individuals to live healthier life styles to reduce demand for services. Proper tire inflation is something individuals can do to help share in reducing demand long term. It is only logical and I find the negative reaction both comical and sad.

You know what even more people over look because it's under the hood and inside a box with screws holding it together....the air filter...it would make more of a difference than any tires pressure changes. as much as 3 times a difference over properly inflated tires.

I am not saying don't properly inflate your tires....but to choose one of the worst ways to save on energy for vehicles users shows he isn't really in touch with how the average American can actually save money....tire pressure won't do it...complete tune ups would have been more useful of a statement...anything other than tire pressures then claiming it will save as much as if we drill for more oil...


His assumptions are the American public is to ignorant to already be doing these items...and that if all Americans did it we could save 3-4%....lawyers should stick to law...or be more general in their answers for something like "what can I do to save money?" he opened himself up on that one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-06-2008, 09:41 AM
 
Location: San Antonio North
4,148 posts, read 4,427,340 times
Reputation: 991
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/***/maintain.shtml (broken link)

"You can improve your gas mileage by around 3.3 percent by keeping your tires inflated to the proper pressure. Under-inflated tires can lower gas mileage by 0.4 percent for every 1 psi drop in pressure of all four tires. Properly inflated tires are safer and last longer"

This is from the current Republican Department of Energy recommendations. If you disagree with it then argue with your DOE. If you read the link they have another of maintenance tips for saving fuel.

However I guess this could be more Rove led misinformation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
Keep Your Engine Properly Tuned
Fixing a car that is noticeably out of tune or has failed an emissions test can improve its gas mileage by an average of 4 percent, though results vary based on the kind of repair and how well it is done.

Fixing a serious maintenance problem, such as a faulty oxygen sensor, can improve your mileage by as much as 40 percent.

Fuel Economy Benefit: 4%
Equivalent Gasoline Savings: $0.16/gallon
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
Check & Replace Air Filters Regularly

Replacing a clogged air filter can improve your car's gas mileage by as much as 10 percent. Your car's air filter keeps impurities from damaging the inside of your engine. Not only will replacing a dirty air filter save gas, it will protect your engine.
Fuel Economy Benefit: up to 10%
Equivalent Gasoline Savings: up to $0.40/gallon
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
Use the Recommended Grade of Motor Oil

You can improve your gas mileage by 1-2 percent by using the manufacturer's recommended grade of motor oil. For example, using 10W-30 motor oil in an engine designed to use 5W-30 can lower your gas mileage by 1-2 percent. Using 5W-30 in an engine designed for 5W-20 can lower your gas mileage by 1-1.5 percent. Also, look for motor oil that says "Energy Conserving" on the API performance symbol to be sure it contains friction-reducing additives.

Fuel Economy Benefit:

Fuel Economy Benefit: 1-2%
Equivalent Gasoline Savings: $0.04-$0.08/gallon

This is all cute but this is not what Obama he said.

He said we can save as much oil as we can get from more drilling which is just not true. You keep posting this help information!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-06-2008, 09:44 AM
 
Location: San Antonio North
4,148 posts, read 4,427,340 times
Reputation: 991
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post

"And if everybody in America inflated their tires to the proper level we would actually PROBABLY save more oil than JM drilling right below his feet there"


He still has it stuck in his head that everyone in America is ignorant and doesn't already do this.....he is assuming our total oil consumption would be reduced by 3-4%.....well that sounds nice and all but that 3-4% is gas mileage savings for one person....if one assumes everyone in America is stupid and doesn't already do this the maximum we could save by doing this is 3-4% of gas we use.

This is why I saw lawyers wouldn't make good mechanics...if only half of the people in America aren't ignorant and already do this to their tires...then the max we could save would be 1.5-2%.....if more thna half do it already then there is virtually no savings.

That's why lawyers should let the experts speak about things like mechanics and he should just stick with law.


Yet he claims republicans are ignorant....what he is really saying that all Americans are ignorant with his assumptions.

It has been said over and over buddy his minions do not care. They will find truth in every word and sentence he says even it means playing dumb or changing a few words around. Or the best they tell us what HE meant!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top