Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If they think that life begins at conception, then that means that there are 40 million Americans who are not here [because they were aborted] that could have voted. They would call that a holocaust and for them it would like if I'm Jewish and a Holocaust denier is running for office. I don't care how right he is on everything else, it's a deal breaker for me. I'm not going to vote for a Holocaust denier...
It is obvious - obama did himself no favors when he couldn't answer THE question. When his voting record comes out on abortion and infanticide - he will be done.
It is obvious - obama did himself no favors when he couldn't answer THE question. When his voting record comes out on abortion and infanticide - he will be done.
First off, Obama can talk faith. He went to a faith forum LONG before McCain did, and many feared the republican wouldn't be able ot discuss his faith. He did in the end, good for him, but Obama had quite a while earlier.
In the issue of abortion, Obama is not hoping for abortions, but he doesn't think it is the government's place to make such a personal decision. He thinks that an abortion is not something taken lightly, and that women must talk it over with people close to them, to find out where they stand. He then said that what the government needs to do is find ways to reduce those abortions as much as possible, but it still shouldn't be a beurocracy controlled issue.
Personally, It is the one issue I disagree with Obama on. But I can easily see where he's coming from, all he wants is for the people to not have to deal with government intervention on such a personal topic. I can respect that.
Meanwhile, the republican attacks try to paint him as a monster for wanting to provide that privacy. I think that is pretty monsterous in and of itself.
Obama should have not done that "debate" .
No Dem should as God and politics dont mix and we should have seperation of church and state. In reality we do not.
Obama paid in the polls for making that mistake. He needs to debate issues not Relegion .
Due to that stupid move if he doesnt win the next debate he will not be the President.
What's your point? Or, perhaps we can begin to discuss the shades of gray in this black and white World you live in. How many flies have you killed in your lifetime? Ants? Spiders? Opportunities?
First off, Obama can talk faith. He went to a faith forum LONG before McCain did, and many feared the republican wouldn't be able ot discuss his faith. He did in the end, good for him, but Obama had quite a while earlier.
In the issue of abortion, Obama is not hoping for abortions, but he doesn't think it is the government's place to make such a personal decision. He thinks that an abortion is not something taken lightly, and that women must talk it over with people close to them, to find out where they stand. He then said that what the government needs to do is find ways to reduce those abortions as much as possible, but it still shouldn't be a beurocracy controlled issue.
Personally, It is the one issue I disagree with Obama on. But I can easily see where he's coming from, all he wants is for the people to not have to deal with government intervention on such a personal topic. I can respect that.
Meanwhile, the republican attacks try to paint him as a monster for wanting to provide that privacy. I think that is pretty monsterous in and of itself.
Talking faith is exactly what Warren referred to in this link.
Talking faith is for people wishing to act like they are religious.
Obama should have not done that "debate" .
No Dem should as God and politics dont mix and we should have seperation of church and state. In reality we do not.
Obama paid in the polls for making that mistake. He needs to debate issues not Relegion .
Due to that stupid move if he doesnt win the next debate he will not be the President.
If he would just be himself he would be fine as far as presentation. The problem is he is the farthest left leaning liberal. It's not going to be easy to try and paint yourself as a centralist....He needs to stop skirting around questions and answer directly and with his true beliefs. People stop listening to the guy that's talking from all angles. They follow people who make the decision and follow through. Who want's a president second guessing themselves all the time.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,287 posts, read 54,100,737 times
Reputation: 40586
The only thing I take from this is if Warren wants to stick his nose into politics it's a clear indication the IRS should be taxing him and his church.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.