|

09-09-2008, 11:21 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
1,512 posts, read 470,745 times
Reputation: 489
|
|
So what's wrong with overturning Roe v. Wade?
Why not let the individual states decide?
|
|

09-09-2008, 11:25 PM
|
|
BEEP BEEP RIBBY RIBBY!
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
1,609 posts, read 1,160,532 times
Reputation: 265
|
|
|
a lot is wrong with it. Feel free to volunteer yourself as an adopting parent if you're so pro-life.
|
|

09-09-2008, 11:27 PM
|
|
Queen of my humble realm
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
7,413 posts, read 3,685,479 times
Reputation: 2115
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nick is rulz
a lot is wrong with it. Feel free to volunteer yourself as an adopting parent if you're so pro-life.
|
Oh, there would be no shortage of "adopting parents." Why do you think so many Americans adopt from foreign countries? There's a huge shortage of babies to adopt here.
|
|

09-09-2008, 11:27 PM
|
|
ichigo ichie 1 time 1 meeting unprecedented
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: southern california
26,912 posts, read 10,369,339 times
Reputation: 17289
|
|
|
the closer an unborn comes to term the more it looks like a baby killing.
it was never intended to be a birth control method ever.
but that is how it is used in japan and america.
|
|

09-09-2008, 11:28 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
3,009 posts, read 1,144,035 times
Reputation: 589
|
|
|
Founding fathers understood the dangers of small segments of society implementing local laws that would be too "far off" and weaken the country. Hence, there are some Federal issues that cannot be overridden at local levels. Example would be it is not OK to have slavery in a state even of the majority maybe ok with it.
|
|

09-09-2008, 11:31 PM
|
|
Queen of my humble realm
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
7,413 posts, read 3,685,479 times
Reputation: 2115
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZGACK
Why not let the individual states decide?
|
It's a constitutional issue. The states do have some leeway in putting requirements/restrictions on abortion but that's it.
Personally, I don't understand why someone is charged with two murders if he/she kills (inadvertently or intentionally) a pregnant woman but the pregnant woman herself can abort until late in the pregnancy. Doesn't make sense.
Overturning Roe v. Wade would mean personal responsibility. Can't have that, can we? 
|
|

09-09-2008, 11:36 PM
|
|
BEEP BEEP RIBBY RIBBY!
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
1,609 posts, read 1,160,532 times
Reputation: 265
|
|
|
no, it would just result in a lot of urgent care needed for injuries/infections from illegally performed operations.
You should all realize this whole "pretend it doesnt exist" attitude is not going to solve the problem. Preaching abstinence did not prevent Queen Palin's seed from getting knocked up.
|
|

09-09-2008, 11:38 PM
|
|
Queen of my humble realm
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
7,413 posts, read 3,685,479 times
Reputation: 2115
|
|
|
Uh, you do realize that now there are foolproof, no-mess, no-fuss methods of birth control available that people prior to the 1960s couldn't even dream about?
Get a birth control implant, ladies -- not an abortion.
|
|

09-09-2008, 11:40 PM
|
|
BEEP BEEP RIBBY RIBBY!
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
1,609 posts, read 1,160,532 times
Reputation: 265
|
|
|
ok, so should it be paid for with your tax dollars for low income sexually active women...or do you not support it then?
|
|

09-09-2008, 11:42 PM
|
|
Queen of my humble realm
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
7,413 posts, read 3,685,479 times
Reputation: 2115
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nick is rulz
ok, so should it be paid for with your tax dollars for low income sexually active women...or do you not support it then?
|
Of course it should. It's far less expensive than serial abortions and welfare.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|