Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-12-2008, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
5,238 posts, read 8,793,158 times
Reputation: 2647

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by coastalrap View Post
So the fact that Obama didn't know either makes him stupid too?
He's talked about it unprompted on numerous occasions, including in debates and speeches.


On War & Peace: Al Qaida is stronger than before thanks to the Bush doctrine

"Part of the reason that we neglected Afghanistan, part of the reason that we didn't go after bin Laden as aggressively as we should have is we were distracted by a war of choice. That's the flaw of the Bush doctrine. It wasn't that he went after those who attacked America. It was that he went after those who didn't. As a consequence, we have been bogged down, paid extraordinary--an extraordinary price in blood and treasure, and we have fanned the anti- American sentiment that actually makes it more difficult for us to act in Pakistan. It is absolutely true that we have to, as much as possible, get Pakistan's agreement before we act. And that's always going to be the case. But we have to make sure that we do not hesitate to act when it comes to Al Qaida. Because they are currently stronger than they were at any time since 2001, partly because we took our eye off the ball." [SIZE=1] Source: 2008 Facebook/WMUR-NH Democratic primary debate Jan 6, 2006 [/SIZE]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-12-2008, 06:57 AM
 
Location: Turn Left at Greenland
17,764 posts, read 39,731,146 times
Reputation: 8253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art123 View Post
He's talked about it unprompted on numerous occasions, including in debates and speeches.


On War & Peace: Al Qaida is stronger than before thanks to the Bush doctrine

"Part of the reason that we neglected Afghanistan, part of the reason that we didn't go after bin Laden as aggressively as we should have is we were distracted by a war of choice. That's the flaw of the Bush doctrine. It wasn't that he went after those who attacked America. It was that he went after those who didn't. As a consequence, we have been bogged down, paid extraordinary--an extraordinary price in blood and treasure, and we have fanned the anti- American sentiment that actually makes it more difficult for us to act in Pakistan. It is absolutely true that we have to, as much as possible, get Pakistan's agreement before we act. And that's always going to be the case. But we have to make sure that we do not hesitate to act when it comes to Al Qaida. Because they are currently stronger than they were at any time since 2001, partly because we took our eye off the ball." [SIZE=1] Source: 2008 Facebook/WMUR-NH Democratic primary debate Jan 6, 2006 [/SIZE]
Well Obama gets a pass because all he has to say is that even though he doesn't know, it still sucks. Palin has to tow the line and agree like a good little hairsprayed lipsticked pitbull.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 06:58 AM
 
Location: The Lakes Region
3,074 posts, read 4,725,923 times
Reputation: 2377
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art123 View Post
...until Charlie Gibson told her.

Can this woman really be ready to be President when she doesn't even know HOW bush has changed the principles America uses to justify war?

I think not.


YouTube - Sarah Palin on 9/11, the Bush Doctrine, and Pakistan

It's called editing and they can make anything look different than it was. Nothing coming from ABC is fair...

Carrie
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 06:58 AM
 
2,265 posts, read 3,732,937 times
Reputation: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art123 View Post
To say that nobody cares about the Bush Doctrine is ludicrous. Do you not think the American people care about how our President decides to take us to war? Do you think Americans care about whether we justify another Iraq? Do you think they care whether or not we invade Iran, or Russia?

Granted, most people probably do not know the term by name, but a potential President sure as hell should. Bush fundamentally changed the principles upon which we take this country into a war. Specifically he justified a preemptive war - a very dangerous policy change that has effected every American. And the potential next VP should know a little something about it.
2 out of five people can't find Iraq on a globe.
1 out of five don't know how many senators are in congress.
Most people couldn't care less about the Bush doctrine, it's not law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 07:01 AM
 
1,868 posts, read 5,681,724 times
Reputation: 536
The look on her face was priceless when he asked her about the doctrine!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 07:02 AM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
5,238 posts, read 8,793,158 times
Reputation: 2647
Quote:
Originally Posted by paullySC View Post
2 out of five people can't find Iraq on a globe.
1 out of five don't know how many senators are in congress.
Most people couldn't care less about the Bush doctrine, it's not law.
5 out of 5 people know we went to war with Iraq.

Our next VP should know the principles upon which that war was justified. Period. We shouldn't elect the average Jane to be VP/potential POTUS. We should elect someone who is knowledgeable and competent, like Joe Biden.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 07:03 AM
 
Location: Wantagh NY
690 posts, read 1,015,561 times
Reputation: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by domergurl View Post

That was great!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 07:03 AM
 
Location: Downtown Greensboro, NC
3,491 posts, read 8,582,142 times
Reputation: 631
The funniest thing is towards the end of the interview she was talking real slow and sounded like a 5 year old trying to read.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,944,793 times
Reputation: 7118
Did you watch the second interview this morning? Obviously, even ABC doesn't think much of your molehill mountain.

She was fantastic - again!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Turn Left at Greenland
17,764 posts, read 39,731,146 times
Reputation: 8253
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsoboi View Post
The funniest thing is towards the end of the interview she was talking real slow and sounded like a 5 year old trying to read.
Give her a break, that little gnome in her hair was tired! Remember Ratatouille, rat in the chef hat pulling hair telling the guy what to do? I have that going through my head right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top