 |
|
|

09-12-2008, 05:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: On a hill near a river
14,022 posts, read 9,512,817 times
Reputation: 5130
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by domergurl
Dang ... replace "Obama" with "McCain" and you can really see what a clusterF&^% this country is really in for.
|
Indeed. I think we're all supposed to lay back and enjoy it. 
|
|

09-12-2008, 05:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Came-by-Chance
1,857 posts, read 306,022 times
Reputation: 579
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by teatime
|
The fact the the domain is .net instead of .com makes me suspicious.
|
|

09-12-2008, 05:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Texas
8,067 posts, read 9,437,846 times
Reputation: 3428
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingForward
That site is under investigation, as is the clintondems.com site. Any democrat reading through it can easily see that it's, in all likelihood, a neo-con stealth site, with posters posing as Clinton-loving Obama defectors. Like I said, it's under investigation.
|
Oh, please. Anyone reading through the site, which I have, can see that these are people who are big-time Hillary supporters, are committed to her and totally ticked at how she was treated by the Dems. Nice try. 
|
|

09-12-2008, 05:35 PM
|
|
|
|
7,352 posts, read 5,269,374 times
Reputation: 1835
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by teatime
Oh, please. Anyone reading through the site, which I have, can see that these are people who are big-time Hillary supporters, are committed to her and totally ticked at how she was treated by the Dems. Nice try. 
|
I'm sorry, teatime, but you are incorrect. But those sites *are* under investigation. You can choose not to believe me, of course. And I can't provide "proof." Rather--I could, but it would not be wise to do so. Sorry.
|
|

09-12-2008, 05:37 PM
|
|
|
|
7,352 posts, read 5,269,374 times
Reputation: 1835
|
|
|
P.S. I have no doubt that some of the people on these sites are ticked-off Hillary supporters, who've been deceived into believing that the sites were begun by equally disappointed Democrats. The chances are very good that they were not. And that's all that I'm going to say on the matter.
|
|

09-12-2008, 05:37 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Washington state
7,145 posts, read 4,651,512 times
Reputation: 1823
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by teatime
Oh, please. Anyone reading through the site, which I have, can see that these are people who are big-time Hillary supporters, are committed to her and totally ticked at how she was treated by the Dems. Nice try. 
|
It's true, many of these so called PUMA sites have been started by Republicans.
Democrats for McCain is a good example:
The ANTI-PUMA: democratsformccain.com RUN BY A REGISTERED REPUBLICAN (http://www.yestodemocracy.com/yes_to_democracy_no_to_pu/2008/07/democratsformcc.html - broken link)
|
|

09-12-2008, 05:38 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Turn Left at Greenland
16,755 posts, read 19,830,061 times
Reputation: 6423
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by teatime
Oh, please. Anyone reading through the site, which I have, can see that these are people who are big-time Hillary supporters, are committed to her and totally ticked at how she was treated by the Dems. Nice try. 
|
I'm mad as hell at how Hillary was Quayled. Yea, there I said it.  PUMA
__________________
If there won't be dancing at the revolution, I'm not coming.
Emma Goldman
|
|

09-12-2008, 05:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: On a hill near a river
14,022 posts, read 9,512,817 times
Reputation: 5130
|
|
|
It's called Divide and Conquer, and it works best with fools.
It works with the Arabs. It works with the DNC.
Why change a winning formula?
|
|

09-12-2008, 05:40 PM
|
|
|
|
8,064 posts, read 8,155,854 times
Reputation: 3356
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by teatime
I strongly supported Hillary in the primaries. I'm an Independent voter now supporting McCain. And, no, I'm not a member of any Hillary forums.
|
Now this is interesting. If you don't want to answer, feel free to ignore me. Really, I don't want to put you on the spot. But....
How can you go from a pro-choice, pro-labor, enviromentalist, ERA supporting, gun controlling, NAFTA supporter, secular humanist candidate (Hilary) to the POLAR (ha ha, no pun intended) opposite (Palin)?
|
|

09-12-2008, 05:41 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Turn Left at Greenland
16,755 posts, read 19,830,061 times
Reputation: 6423
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeledaf
Indeed. I think we're all supposed to lay back and enjoy it. 
|
Wait, is Bobby Knight running for President? 
__________________
If there won't be dancing at the revolution, I'm not coming.
Emma Goldman
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Similar Threads
-
Will Biden be removed and Hillary be back, or someone else?, Elections, 12 replies
-
Biden out, Hillary in? Any chance?, Elections, 24 replies
-
Hang on in there, Hillary. It's too soon to quit, Elections, 9 replies
-
Hillary Needs to QUIT With DIGNITY, Elections, 23 replies
-
NYTimes telling Hillary to quit after endorsing her???, Elections, 3 replies
|