Wall Street Journal: Why Obama's Healthcare Plan is Better (health care, campaign, biased)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sustained growth thus requires successful health-care reform. Barack Obama and John McCain propose to lead us in opposite directions -- and the Obama direction is far superior.
Sen. Obama's proposal will modernize our current system of employer- and government-provided health care, keeping what works well, and making the investments now that will lead to a more efficient medical system. He does this in five ways....
In the interest of fairness, it should be pointed out that one of the co-authors is the advisor to Obama's campain -it says so at the bottom of the WSJ article
"Mr. Cutler is professor of economics at Harvard and an adviser to Barack Obama's presidential campaign."
In the interest of fairness, it should be pointed out that one of the co-authors is the advisor to Obama's campain -it says so at the bottom of the WSJ article.
Critical thinking is equally important. I think you missed my point that it was going to be a biased article.
Nope, I understood what you meant. Had the article been a WSJ authored editorial, rather than an advocate advertisement disguised as an article, it would have carried more significance with me.
In the interest of fairness, it should be pointed out that one of the co-authors is the advisor to Obama's campain -it says so at the bottom of the WSJ article
"Mr. Cutler is professor of economics at Harvard and an adviser to Barack Obama's presidential campaign."
Furthermore, the piece is offered as an opinion and not an analysis. But I guess the fact that it was printed in the WSJ is supposed to lend it some credence. Interesting, lefties citing the WSJ.
Furthermore, the piece is offered as an opinion and not an analysis. But I guess the fact that it was printed in the WSJ is supposed to lend it some credence. Interesting, lefties citing the WSJ.
Continuing in the interest of fairness, I think the righties will do the same if given an opportunity.
(Note to self: do not PO everyone)
Probably. Nobody really seems to care about this stuff. The McCain campaign mantra seems to be, "Anything But The Issues."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
