Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-21-2008, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,940,832 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

17 times in just 2008.

Gateway Pundit

Quote:
For many years the President and his Administration have not only warned of the systemic consequences of financial turmoil at a housing government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) but also put forward thoughtful plans to reduce the risk that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would encounter such difficulties. President Bush publicly called for GSE reform 17 times in 2008 alone before Congress acted.

Unfortunately, these warnings went unheeded, as the President's repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems.
Read the list;

Quote:
More... Not only did democrats not act on these warnings but Barack Obama put one of the major Sub-Prime Slime players on his campaign as finance chairperson.
Consortiumnews.com

Quote:
Unfortunately, this wasn’t the case for the 1,406 people who lost much of their life savings when Superior Bank of Chicago went belly up in 2001 with over $1 billion in insured and uninsured deposits. This collapse came amid harsh criticism of how Superior's owners promoted sub-prime home mortgages. As part of a settlement, the owners paid $100 million and agreed to pay another $335 million over 15 years at no interest.
Penny Pritzer - Obama's Finance co-chair. Nice. Let's not mention Raines and Johnson.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-21-2008, 11:43 AM
 
564 posts, read 815,380 times
Reputation: 192
Sanrene,

You and I are eye to eye on most issues. But the blame here goes all around.. Liberals, Conservatives, Lenders, Lendees, Investment Banks, the Fed, Bond rating agencies.. everyone had their hands in this mess.

It started though with political correctness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2008, 11:44 AM
 
564 posts, read 815,380 times
Reputation: 192
Neal Boortz :: Townhall.com :: The Rest of the Meltdown Story
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2008, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Earth Wanderer, longing for the stars.
12,406 posts, read 18,971,076 times
Reputation: 8912
Quote:
Originally Posted by 123cop View Post
Sanrene,

You and I are eye to eye on most issues. But the blame here goes all around.. Liberals, Conservatives, Lenders, Lendees, Investment Banks, the Fed, Bond rating agencies.. everyone had their hands in this mess.

It started though with political correctness.
Of coarse not. It started with deregulating financial institutions, with cutting the budget of regulatory agencies, with appointing 'yes men' to head these agenciec, some with no prior experience to prepare them for such a job, with loading courts with the same sort of madmen.

Most of this can be lain at the feet of Republicans.
Certainly all of it happened at the behest of mega corporations' influence on our government and when we object we are called Communist or some such madness.

The chickens are coming home to roost for Republicanism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2008, 12:05 PM
 
5,524 posts, read 9,938,373 times
Reputation: 1867
CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - Fact Check: Did Obama ‘profit’ from Fannie and Freddie? « - Blogs from CNN.com

Quote:
The New York Times has published a separate list looking at contributions from "directors, officers, and lobbyists for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac" for the 2008 campaign cycle. That list — using figures from the Federal Election Commission — shows McCain receiving $169,000, while Obama received only $16,000.
The pocket lining is on both sides. Funny how you never mention that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top