Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have gotten two emails today stating that Joe Biden is gonna resign as VP candidate on or about Oct. 5th, due to "health reasons" - specifically - recurring problems w/ an earlier diagnosed aneurysm. Hillary Clinton will then be chosen as VP.
What is going on? I have been waiting to see what the "October Surprise" will be and evidently this is supposed to be the rabbit that DEMS will pull out of this year's election hat.
Anyone else heard this rumor/speculation?
I think one thing it does remind people by Biden stepping down for medical reasons is McCain's age and his health issues.
Most of you do. There may be "exceptions" but the vast majority of Republicans ARE radicals.
This is the war party, this is the spend everyones money party (and borrow more from China) this is the anti science party, this is the "Doing God's will in Iraq" party, this party is the American equivalent of the Taliban.
That is extemely narrow minded and limited, so I guess all democrats are narrow minded and have a very limited view of anyone not agreeing with them on everything. See how stupid that is?
Rush is talking about this email today. He thinks it's going to happen, especially with all the gaffes piling up.
Do you think the gaffes are intentional so it looks like that is why he pulled out? Not that Biden isn't capable of enough gaffes on his own, but some of this seems so obvious.
Do you think the gaffes are intentional so it looks like that is why he pulled out? Not that Biden isn't capable of enough gaffes on his own, but some of this seems so obvious.
No, gaffes aren't intentional. You would never want to give an opponent that kind of ammunition and "quotes".
I think obama realizes he has a serious, possibly fatal problem with clinton supporters and women in general.
However, I don't know how it would play to put in a woman now that everybody realizes he has a problem with this demographic - it would look like too much a political play and pandering.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,327 posts, read 54,350,985 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Friendly blogger
You mean values like the Kennedy family who hold the world record for affairs to remember, JFK, Teddy& Chappaquidick, and his father Old Joe's affair with Gloria Swanson, his deals with the SEC et cetera? like John Kerry who married for money, of John Edwards who justified his romp in the hay by saying, " I only did it when her illness was in remission." You mean Charlie Rangel of, " make a deal on the side fame." Come on folks, the Democrats are famous for giving you "some" so you won't notice what they are doing and with whom. I am a Harry Truman Democrat. He has to rolling over in his grave watching this group of groupies.
How conveniently you overlook the affairs of Newt Gingrich, John McCain, Larry Craig, etc., etc., etc.........................................
And gee, since you seem to think JFK's father's sex life is relevant why don't we bring up Palin's daughter?
That is extemely narrow minded and limited, so I guess all democrats are narrow minded and have a very limited view of anyone not agreeing with them on everything. See how stupid that is?
It's not fair to generalize at all. The loud and proud conservatives, unfortunately, give all republicans a bad name. Having one on the ticket this year doesn't help Republicans to appear mainstream. Palin's extreme and rigid views are bringing out all the christian freaks who think they have the right to impose their will upon everyone else.
Normal Republicans should not be compared to those far right lunatics.
It's not fair to generalize at all. The loud and proud conservatives, unfortunately, give all republicans a bad name. Having one on the ticket this year doesn't help Republicans to appear mainstream. Palin's extreme and rigid views are bringing out all the christian freaks who think they have the right to impose their will upon everyone else.
Normal Republicans should not be compared to those far right lunatics.
Then it would be fair to say socialist/marxist/communist give all democrats a bad name....
It's not fair to generalize at all. The loud and proud conservatives, unfortunately, give all republicans a bad name. Having one on the ticket this year doesn't help Republicans to appear mainstream. Palin's extreme and rigid views are bringing out all the christian freaks who think they have the right to impose their will upon everyone else.
Normal Republicans should not be compared to those far right lunatics.
And the fact that you use the term "christian freaks" says a lot.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
