Ron Paul endorses Chuck Baldwin (vote, campaign, thought, democratic)

[KantLockeMeIn]

"I’ve thought about the unsolicited advice from the Libertarian Party candidate, and he has convinced me to reject my neutral stance in the November election. I’m supporting Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate."

Ron Paul’s Campaign For Liberty » Blog Archive » A New Alliance - By Dr. Ron Paul | The Revolution Continues

Endorsements don't mean much to me personally, but I figured I would share the news.

[WingsOfGold]

Good, one virtual unknown endorsing Mister X. That's showing em alright.

[Mamama Mia]

Originally Posted by WingsOfGold

Good, one virtual unknown endorsing Mister X. That's showing em alright.

I agree. Nothing says forward thinking like throwing your vote away.

[ocexpo]

Oh brother....he will just never go away. He lost, he needs to stop whining.

[WingsOfGold]

Originally Posted by Mamama Mia

I agree. Nothing says forward thinking like throwing your vote away.

Yup, he's showin em alright, at least Nader was a GOOD commie, Perot bad ahole.

[KantLockeMeIn]

Anyone else care to spout igorant statments, or is this all?

[ocexpo]

I think Paul is a sore loser. He lost....nobody voted for him, the democratic process spoke and they didn't choose him to be their nominee. Its like "if its not me, then it shall be nobody" which is extremely selfish and I would never want someone that self centered to be president.

I mean, what kind of person holds a "counter convention" in the same city on the same days just to make a statement? Would you ever want someone that is so self absorbed to be president?

[WingsOfGold]

Originally Posted by KantLockeMeIn

Anyone else care to spout igorant statments, or is this all?

You show em Tiger, we're all just igorant.

[KantLockeMeIn]

Originally Posted by Mamama Mia

I agree. Nothing says forward thinking like throwing your vote away.

Since 1996 no Republican candidate has come within 10% of a Democratic candidate for the office of President in Illinois. Since you're interested in not wasting a vote, and feel that hitching your vote to the winning horse, I suggest you vote for Obama in the upcoming election.

Otherwise spare me the spiel about throwing away a vote. Your vote won't be a winning one either considering where you live.

[KantLockeMeIn]

Originally Posted by ocexpo

I think Paul is a sore loser. He lost....nobody voted for him, the democratic process spoke and they didn't choose him to be their nominee. Its like "if its not me, then it shall be nobody" which is extremely selfish and I would never want someone that self centered to be president.

I mean, what kind of person holds a "counter convention" in the same city on the same days just to make a statement? Would you ever want someone that is so self absorbed to be president?

Sore loser? Hilarious. Principled and passionate about his ideals and being unwilling to compromise on those principles is now defined as selfish... I love it.

I would want someone to be President who actually puts thought into the bills that pass through the oval office... specifically its Constitutionality. Republicans talk a good game about reducing the size of government and sticking to the Constitution... but have proven otherwise when they had every opportunity to enact change.

I would want someone who had the foresight in 2003 to realize that the housing market was being propped up by low interest rates. Someone who felt the need to speak out against the Fed, even though few listened.

But I guess you want a puppet for the party... to each his own.