U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Reload this Page Is There A Bigger Group of WATBs Anywhere????? (votes, Congress, thought)
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
 Search Forums  (Advanced)
 Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 09-29-2008, 10:02 PM
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Idaho Falls
4,915 posts, read 1,352,290 times
Reputation: 1384
idahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud ofidahogie has much to be proud of
Default Is There A Bigger Group of WATBs Anywhere?????
The GOP, that is.


Cry-baby Boehner and Roy Blunt blame Pelosi for saying mean things about them. So then the majority of the GOP votes against a bill that they previously thought was vital to the country, possibly including it's survival as a superpower. The majority of the GOP can't get over a speech that nobody heard? Either that, or Boehner, Blunt, and McCain can't lead their own party (but of course, we know that can't be true - the McCain defenders here tell us so).

But McCain takes the cake,
flip-flopping in two sentences: "Senator Obama and his allies in Congress infused unnecessary partisanship into the process. Now is not the time to fix the blame. It's time to fix the problem."

Shorter McCain: "Dems are to blame, but now's not the time to blame."

[I added lots of punctuation marks in the title. That seems to get the wingnut's attention best.]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

« If Palin were a male candidate?? | Has Sarah Palin found examples for Katie Couric yet? »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:38 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top