Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hmmm, she's all for the death penalty for a repeat child rapist (I am too) yet should that child (some girls start menstruation at age 9 or 10) become pregnant by that same rapist, she would prohibit that child the right to an abortion; she would condemn that child to 9 months of carrying the product of that rape; she would allow that child to go through the pain of child birth; she's disgusting!!
Hmmm, she's all for the death penalty for a repeat child rapist (I am too) yet should that child (some girls start menstruation at age 9 or 10) become pregnant by that same rapist, she would prohibit that child the right to an abortion; she would condemn that child to 9 months of carrying the product of that rape; she would allow that child to go through the pain of child birth; she's disgusting!!
I believe there's a supreme court decision called Roe vs Wade that's been around for 35 years for a woman's right to abortion. Bush or Palin can say all they want but it ain't going to be overturned in our society today. Furthermore if it is overturned by some miracle, it would become a state issue, where only a select handful of states such as South Dakota would overturn abortion "except in special circumstances, including rape, incest, etc." Go check your facts lady.
I believe there's a supreme court decision called Roe vs Wade that's been around for 35 years for a woman's right to abortion. Bush or Palin can say all they want but it ain't going to be overturned in our society today. Furthermore if it is overturned by some miracle, it would become a state issue, where only a select handful of states such as South Dakota would overturn abortion "except in special circumstances, including rape, incest, etc." Go check your facts lady.
Now, now, don't present anything rational to them! Their dear little programmed minds might short-circuit! I mean, they can't read the candidate's own words on the subject -- they have to wait until their people spin it in an appropriately vile way for them!
OooOOOoooOOOoooh! The party of "tolerance".....must not.....hate....
Bud
Not liking someone has nothing to do w/tolerance. I'm not trying to restrict her rights, I'm not telling her what to do. What I am saying is that I don't think she should be in the white house, plain & simple.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I mean, they can't read the candidate's own words on the subject -- they have to wait until their people spin it in an appropriately vile way for them!
