Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2008, 10:35 AM
 
615 posts, read 1,171,658 times
Reputation: 133

Advertisements

By Steven M. Warshawsky

Despite there being an entire cottage industry devoted to exposing the liberal bias of the mainstream media, Republicans and conservatives continue to allow themselves to be unduly influenced, and even demoralized, by what they read and hear in the big city newspapers and on network television.


What are they reading and hearing? That Barack Obama will be the next President of the United States. It's inevitable. It's his election to lose. What proof does the media offer? Public opinion polls that supposedly show Obama "winning" the race. (But see here and here.) The thousands of devoted supporters who attend Obama's rallies. The legions of blacks and young people who are more "inspired" than ever to vote for a candidate who understands their needs and interests. Etc. We all know the story by heart by now.


This is the "narrative" that the mainstream media has been imposing on this year's presidential campaign almost from the start. Remember how quickly the MSM jumped off the Hillary Clinton bandwagon and onto Obama's? Remember how annoyed and angry they became as Hillary refused to concede the nomination? The MSM decided that electing the nation's first black, socialist, anti-American president was politically and historically more important (and, for them, more exciting) than electing the nation's first female, socialist, patriotic president. And they are doing everything they can to achieve this goal.


Well, there is another story out there that the MSM refuses to address. A huge story. One that could, and I think will, significantly affect the outcome of this race. I'm referring to the widespread phenomenon of registered Democrats openly supporting John McCain. There are numerous "Democrats for McCain" type organizations. There are numerous websites and blogs written by Democrats touting McCain's candidacy. There are pro-McCain grassroots efforts being led by Democrats. And we all know friends or relatives who are Democrats, who voted for John Kerry in 2004, and who are no fans of President Bush - but who are going to vote for John McCain this year.


Yet, surprise surprise, the mainstream media is not talking about these voters, not talking about the real rift that is occurring within the ranks of the Democratic Party. Needless to say, if a similar rift were occurring in the Republican Party, it would be treated as the major story that it is. (Indeed, as such stories about the political fault lines in the Republican Party have been treated in the recent past.)


Who are these pro-McCain Democratic voters? They overwhelmingly tend to be former Hillary supporters. Perhaps the most well-known of these voters are the "PUMAs" - which stands for Party Unity My Ass. These are Hillary supporters who are adamantly opposed to Obama. Let's not forget that during the Democratic primaries - real elections, not polls - Hillary crushed Obama among white working-class and middle-class voters in such key states as Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. If a meaningful number of these voters end up voting for McCain, as I predict they will, then Obama's smooth road to the White House is going to run smack into a brick wall.


Earlier this week, I attended a John McCain campaign event in New York City. There were several Democrats in attendance. Not only people who are registered Democrats, but party leaders and workers who had been actively involved in Hillary Clinton's campaign. Indeed, the gentlemen who "keynoted" the event was a former publisher of the left-wing Village Voice magazine and a veteran of the Robert Kennedy, George McGovern, and Jimmy Carter campaigns. Hardly a right-wing conservative. He gave one of the best stump speeches I have heard why Barack Obama should not be elected president. (It comes down to not trusting Obama to keep the United States safe and strong in a dangerous world and rejecting Obama's "government knows best" attitude when it comes to domestic issues.) Another person I met at the event was a sprightly elderly woman who manned telephones for Hillary for five months, and now is supporting McCain.


There is nothing remotely similar to this taking place among Republicans. (No, Christopher Buckley endorsing Obama is not the same thing at all.)


Some more anecdotal evidence of a lack of support for Obama among Democrats: I live in the Upper West Side neighborhood of New York City. You cannot find too many places in the country that are more liberal than that. Walking around my neighborhood during the 2004 presidential campaign, I felt "assaulted" on all sides by Kerry-Edwards buttons, bumper stickers, and posters. This year, there clearly is not the same level of outward support for Obama. It is remarkable (and welcome). Will most of the people in my neighborhood vote for Obama on election day? Of course. Will Obama win New York? Almost certainly. But the lack of enthusiasm for Obama among these Democrats, who I'm sure would be going gaga for Hillary, speaks volumes about Obama's true prospects for victory this year.


The point is simple: Don't believe the Obama hype coming out of the mainstream media. If the media were truly objective and unbiased, they would be covering the race much differently. Instead of trying to browbeat the country into voting for Obama, they would be analyzing the issues and factors that favor and disfavor both candidates. Instead of focusing on college students and intellectuals, they would be focusing on working-class and middle-class voters, especially "Hillary Democrats." These voters may very well determine the election. Yet this huge story is being ignored by the MSM.


Furthermore, the media would not so consistently confuse intensity of support for breadth of support. Granted, Barack Obama's supporters tend to be more enthusiastic about their candidate than John McCain's supporters are about him. Leftists are always looking for their earthly messiah. But this does not mean that Obama's supporters, come election day, will outnumber McCain's. Whether in support of McCain or in opposition to Obama, I predict these voters will go to the polls. Contrary to the wishful thinking of Democratic pundits, they are not staying home. These voters may be unexcited, but they are not apathetic. And 51% of "unexcited" voters will defeat 49% of even the most "inspired" voters. Every time.


Of course, we all know what the mainstream media's "narrative" will be if (I believe, when) John McCain wins the election: The American people refused to vote for Obama because of the color of his skin (and not because of the content of his politics). The "right-wing attack machine" scared voters into voting for McCain, even against their own social and economic self-interest. Black and poor voters were intimidated by Republican thugs and prevented from voting. We know this story by heart as well.


So be prepared. In a few more weeks, the political environment in this country is likely to become a heckuva lot nastier. For there are real signs pointing to a McCain victory this year, whether or not the mainstream media wants to acknowledge them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2008, 10:40 AM
 
1 posts, read 1,771,734 times
Reputation: 10
LOL, keep DREAMING....and this is re-post by one of your rebulicon friends.

But it's actually great you've found something to soothe your panicking and hyperventilating.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 10:42 AM
 
543 posts, read 1,455,700 times
Reputation: 243
Well I do think that it will be closer than the liberal media would like people to think. The media this election was so unabashedly biased (they have been in the past but this election was unprecedented). If you are a person that votes on popularity or superficial reasons, you will probably be swayed by the Obama hysteria. Hopefully, there are some sane people left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 10:43 AM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,190,023 times
Reputation: 4027
I just saw the OP over at freerepublic.com, was wondering how long it would take for somebody to C&P it here!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 10:43 AM
 
1,535 posts, read 2,061,990 times
Reputation: 455
Admittedly anecdotal evidence vs statistical survey...Admittedly anecdotal evidence vs statistical survey...Admittedly anecdotal evidence vs statistical survey...Admittedly anecdotal evidence vs statistical survey...Admittedly anecdotal evidence vs statistical survey...Admittedly anecdotal evidence vs statistical survey...

I think I know which one I'm going with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 10:44 AM
 
Location: In the sunshine on a ship with a plank
3,413 posts, read 8,835,057 times
Reputation: 2263
Balco, your status says:

Status: "Nothing better than an ice cold Heineken"


Did you dig into the cooler early today?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,212 posts, read 19,509,699 times
Reputation: 21679
The Repukes have been living in La La land since before we invaded Iraq, why change now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 10:45 AM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,440,298 times
Reputation: 3050
Well they hope if they portray it to be true it will be!
Because everyone is a sheeple and needs to be told what to do or they cannot function in this world before Obama....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 10:45 AM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,190,023 times
Reputation: 4027
Quote:
Originally Posted by pirate girl View Post
Balco, your status says:

Status: "Nothing better than an ice cold Heineken"


Did you dig into the cooler early today?
Heineken should be drank at room temperature, better flavor!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 11:50 AM
 
91 posts, read 311,178 times
Reputation: 155
Laugh. But dont forget those polls that made everyone belive Kerry and Owl Snore was a shoe in. Polls are uselessly biased by whomever comes up with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top