Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-06-2008, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,479,163 times
Reputation: 4185

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by paullySC View Post
It's never more important than our sovereignty.
Do you even know what "sovereignty" means?

If you're beating your wife and I appeal to you to stop, and you do, have you surrendered your "sovereignty"?

There ought to be a moratorium on right-wingers using big words they don't understand. "Socialist" is another one that needs to be retired until they can consult a dictionary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-06-2008, 08:17 PM
 
Location: St. Joseph Area
6,233 posts, read 9,481,332 times
Reputation: 3133
I've thought about this a lot this year and came to these conclusions...

1. U.S. Sovereignty is critical, and of course should be the highest priority (for any nation, really)

2. Being respected and maintaining sovereignty are not mutually exclusive. In fact you could argue that they go together. Respect gives us more clout than people realize, in all areas, especially in promoting Democracy and liberty abroad.

3. On a side note, diplomacy does not always equal appeasement. A lot of neocons would disagree, but they're morons anyway, so who cares?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2008, 08:31 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
15,154 posts, read 11,624,440 times
Reputation: 8625
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
Do you even know what "sovereignty" means?

If you're beating your wife and I appeal to you to stop, and you do, have you surrendered your "sovereignty"?

There ought to be a moratorium on right-wingers using big words they don't understand. "Socialist" is another one that needs to be retired until they can consult a dictionary.
Yes, I know what those big words mean. Do you? Or are you just trolling?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2008, 08:32 PM
 
1,648 posts, read 2,560,415 times
Reputation: 481
Quote:
Originally Posted by mackinac81 View Post
I've thought about this a lot this year and came to these conclusions...

1. U.S. Sovereignty is critical, and of course should be the highest priority (for any nation, really)

2. Being respected and maintaining sovereignty are not mutually exclusive. In fact you could argue that they go together. Respect gives us more clout than people realize, in all areas, especially in promoting Democracy and liberty abroad.

3. On a side note, diplomacy does not always equal appeasement. A lot of neocons would disagree, but they're morons anyway, so who cares?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2008, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,479,163 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17 View Post
Yes, I know what those big words mean. Do you? Or are you just trolling?
Yes, I know what they mean, at least well enough to recognize the self-contradictory intellectual slop that constitutes your OP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2008, 09:05 PM
 
Location: um....guess
10,503 posts, read 15,566,082 times
Reputation: 1836
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
Yes, I know what they mean, at least well enough to recognize the self-contradictory intellectual slop that constitutes your OP.
Here's something I've learned about ELO & a few others on this forum...never ever take anything that they post on here seriously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2008, 09:21 PM
 
Location: Fuquay-Varina
4,003 posts, read 10,841,368 times
Reputation: 3303
I agree with a lot of the sentiment on this thread, from both sides. I do want to state one thing though; our diplomacy role in mediating other countries squabbles with us or our allies only works because we are capable of forcing the issue if necessary. That capability cannot be overlooked or undermined in any way. If we lose the "big stick" or the will to use it, our attempts at diplomacy will produce squat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2008, 09:26 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,479,163 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by sacredgrooves View Post
I agree with a lot of the sentiment on this thread, from both sides. I do want to state one thing though; our diplomacy role in mediating other countries squabbles with us or our allies only works because we are capable of forcing the issue if necessary. That capability cannot be overlooked or undermined in any way. If we lose the "big stick" or the will to use it, our attempts at diplomacy will produce squat.
No, it also works because reason, logic and justice are not always on our side or that of our "allies" and there is room for compromise.

Bush has the same idea of diplomacy as you describe above; that is, as a medium for transmitting threatening postures. Hasn't worked out too well for him or for any of us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2008, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Fuquay-Varina
4,003 posts, read 10,841,368 times
Reputation: 3303
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
No, it also works because reason, logic and justice are not always on our side or that of our "allies" and there is room for compromise.

Bush has the same idea of diplomacy as you describe above; that is, as a medium for transmitting threatening postures. Hasn't worked out too well for him or for any of us.
I think you glossed over my point just to disagree with Bush. If we were not a strong country our attempts at diplomacy would garner little respect or credence with the opposition. I did not post we had to use it, or threaten with it, just that it makes the other side more willing to listen because they already know. If you believe otherwise, imagine Iceland trying to mediate an argument between Iran and Russia.


ps - I can sum it up this way; With the power and might of our country comes great responsibility to do the right thing, but the responsibility is only given because of our power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2008, 09:59 PM
 
9,846 posts, read 22,677,486 times
Reputation: 7738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
the problem is not whether we are a slave to french opinion. the problem is when we are a slave to our own aggression and lust for power. a lust for control over others, when we have none over ourselves.
france is an older sister, one that remembers our common old affection for liberty equality and freedom. we should listen to her.


The USA spent decades getting bombed by radical islamists leading up to 9/11.

Afghanistan was a cesspool. We went in there and scoured it clean. The only pinheads still running around in there causing trouble are foreign radical islamic nutjobs. Finally Afghanistan is quiet and people don't have to worry about a MI-24 Hind massacring their village or the taliban hanging them from a pole. Kids are going to school and people are working.

Iraq was run by one of the worse thugs of the 20th century, Saddam Hussein. He repeatedly tortured and killed his own people including gassing them with chemical weapons. He invaded Iran, causing over a million deaths. He invaded Kuwait and stole everything not nailed down, not to mention one of the greatest environmental disasters in world history, setting the oil fields on fire. He funded terrorist groups including suicide bombers in Israel. He repeatedly pursued WMD's.

Hussein is gone and he wont be bothering us or the world anymore, nor his goofy sons. If democracy works in Iraq it will sent a signal to the rest of the islamic world that living under dictators isn't the only option and it's time to join the rest of the world and not live in 1399.

Don't even get me started on France.

I'm all about peace and love. But I also believe in boundaries and respect and by attacking the USA, we were not being afforded that. Keep in mind the USA contributes more to charity than any other nation. We are about the only country in world history that actually rebuilds it's former enemies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top