Gun control (gasoline, terrorists, legal, carry)

[Tank1906]

Originally Posted by Bill Keegan

What I describe is not chaos & disorder, no matter how many times you say it is. Do I really think people ought to own anthrax?: No, of course I don't. The point is that you and others like you are too concerned with controlling people and the toys they play with. Stop worrying about it, and only be concerned if they are trying to hurt someone eith the toys.

If their are no controls their is anarchy. You can't escape that. I guess every intel agency should pack it in and wait for something bad to happen. How can people be against some form of gun control but for preemptive war..

Should someone be able to carry an Ak-47 on a jetliner?

[fizbin]

Originally Posted by Tank1906

Should someone be able to carry an Ak-47 on a jetliner?

Of course! Laws against that are just one more example of the government messing with my FREEDOM, dude . . .

[Tank1906]

Originally Posted by Greatday

Please - show me where I have indicated, in any form, that I am "scared" I am going to lose my weapons? I defy you to do that -

OBTW - those "toys" have saved my life and the life of my loved ones.

They've killed my loved ones...have fun over your toys.

Your babbling indicates that you fear losing what you "cling to"...

[Greatday]

Originally Posted by Tank1906

They've killed my loved ones...have fun over your toys.

Your babbling indicates that you fear losing what you "cling to"...

No babbling - countering your inane posts

They saved my loved ones

[Tank1906]

Originally Posted by fizbin

Of course! Laws against that are just one more example of the government messing with my FREEDOM, dude . . .

The gun nuts will say that it's their right to hijack a plane with that gun as long as they land it properly.

[Greatday]

Originally Posted by Tank1906

The gun nuts will say that it's their right to hijack a plane with that gun as long as they land it properly.

Wow - how shrill of an argument is the above!

Or, stupid and ridiculous - yeah, that's it

[fizbin]

Originally Posted by Tank1906

The gun nuts will say that it's their right to hijack a plane with that gun as long as they land it properly.

No, no, no. They will prevent the hijacking by pulling the AK-47 out from overhead storage and blasting away . . .

[Tank1906]

Originally Posted by Greatday

No babbling - countering your inane posts

They saved my loved ones

Good for you but guns kill far more than they save. Like I said they were designed to kill and do it well. Gun nuts turned them into toys.

[Tank1906]

Originally Posted by Greatday

Wow - how shrill of an argument is the above!

Or, stupid and ridiculous - yeah, that's it

How about answering the initial question..Oops, you never do that

[Bill Keegan]

Originally Posted by Tank1906

If their are no controls their is anarchy. You can't escape that. I guess every intel agency should pack it in and wait for something bad to happen. How can people be against some form of gun control but for preemptive war..

Should someone be able to carry an Ak-47 on a jetliner?

Yes, you are right. If there is no control there would be anarchy. I never said there should be no controls. I said government should not try to control what people HAVE. Controlling, or preventing harmful acts, is all they need to worry about.