The loser of the night, sarah palin (vote, democrat, Republican)

[EvilRepublican]

Hahahahaha, oh my god you liberals just can't help but bash Palin at EVERY single chance.

The funniest part is most of you don't even have any PARTICULAR reason other than it's just the liberal thing to do.

For the purpose of this thread though, if you want to bring PALIN into this... then she WINS in whatever non-election you speak of... why? Because the candidate she supported DID beat the RINO which was the whole point. Do you really think anybody gives a damn about the 23rd district of New York state? Of course not. That means nothing to national politics. But this shows the GOP that we don't want no more RINOs.

And I think someone else mentioned it above, but PALIN's endorsement shifted TONS of would-be votes for Scozzafava over to Hoffman in the first place. Not to mention lots of other prominent conservatives were supporting Hoffman, but you didn't bother to suggest they hurt the unknown Hoffman. On top of that if Scozzafava's supporters had gotten the memo that she dropped out, Hoffman would/should have probably gotten her votes... and her endorsement of the DNC candidate sure didn't send any votes that way either unless she was just leading a heard of RINOs, lol.

[Goo++]

Originally Posted by nmnita

Have you ever heard of more than one sourse for gathering information?

Nita

Certainly, that's why I am curious about coastalrap's bogus, i.e, nonexistent, source showing his erroneous vote percentages that attempt to turn a 4% margin of victory into a false 2% margin of victory.

[Sunny-Days90]

Why are the libs still scared of Palin?

Get over her already.

And to make matters worse, do you see ALL of the dems running from Obama like he is poison?

So it works both ways I guess, but Obama is suppose to be the messiah and so popular. Guess not.

You need to not look at the win in a race you need to read the message the voters sent in all of those elections.

[city414]

Originally Posted by pghquest

The 3rd party candidate was the CONSERVATIVE party candidate..

I KNOW THAT!
im speaking in terms of democrat vs republican which is what he is looked at to be as well.

if he was the CONSERVATIVE PARTY CANDIDATE and not a republican conservative candidate then the notion of a GOP civil war is overstated

which means he isn't a republican, whats so hard to grasp about that

[city414]

Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90

Why are the libs still scared of Palin?

Get over her already.

And to make matters worse, do you see ALL of the dems running from Obama like he is poison?

So it works both ways I guess, but Obama is suppose to be the messiah and so popular. Guess not.

You need to not look at the win in a race you need to read the message the voters sent in all of those elections.

conservative loons and the infatuation of obama and the word messiah lol. someone should ask you. why are you afraid lol

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by city414

I KNOW THAT!
im speaking in terms of democrat vs republican which is what he is looked at to be as well.

if he was the CONSERVATIVE PARTY CANDIDATE and not a republican conservative candidate then the notion of a GOP civil war is overstated

which means he isn't a republican, whats so hard to grasp about that

The fact that the support for the Republican party tanked after the CONSERVATIVE party candiate joined the race indeed confirms the reality that the 3rd party candidate wasnt even CLOSE to a Democratic ideaology.

[arctichomesteader]

Palin had nothing to do with the outcome. But assuming she did, wouldn't that mean her activity in Virginia made the dem lose there?

Hoffman lost because A) party line voting by Republicans who still voted R even though the R dropped out and endorsed a dem and B)Hoffman himself was a poor politician and C) many conservative R's stayed home.

Nonetheless, he came very close to winning, and he's a third party candidate. A conservative R will likely win that seat next election.

[city414]

Originally Posted by pghquest

The fact that the support for the Republican party tanked after the CONSERVATIVE party candiate joined the race indeed confirms the reality that the 3rd party candidate wasnt even CLOSE to a Democratic ideaology.

doesnt really matter though and i dont believe there is a democrat ideology because there are different manifestos within the party.

bottom line why not support your party? if its ideology you crave when be a republican at all?

i find that a bit odd, but still why was GOP civil war used

[EvilRepublican]

Originally Posted by Goo++

Oh, really? Then I'm sure you can share your erroneous source link with us.

Here's a link with those exact numbers that he gave you, although it was before the final count, but maybe just maybe this is what he read...
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/0...-thread-ny-23/

That's the problem with you liberals, you really think that 50% of this country are just liars... scratch that, most of you wouldn't even be interested in the damn link.

Oh, and check out the link that it links to the for the source and you will see that they took the liberty of bumping the 45.2 to 46, not the poster above. I guess you can blame that irrelevent change on Michelle Malkin... You can probably post an image of her with horns on her head or something, no?

[sanrene]

Originally Posted by Goo++

Certainly, that's why I am curious about coastalrap's bogus, i.e, nonexistent, source showing his erroneous vote percentages that attempt to turn a 4% margin of victory into a false 2% margin of victory.

Certainly, that's why I am curious about Goo++'s bogus, i.e, nonexistent, source showing his erroneous vote percentages that attempt to turn a 3% margin of victory into a false 4% margin of victory.

Same difference.

Watertown Daily Times | HOFFMAN THROWS IN TOWEL

Owens is maintaining a 48 percent to 45 percent lead.

Four precincts in St. Lawrence County are having mechanical problems and total results for the county won't be available tonight

I've also seen 49%-46%.