U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
View Poll Results: Who will win the Massachusetts Senate Seat?
Republican Scott Brown 83 79.05%
Democrat Martha Coakley 22 20.95%
Voters: 105. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Unread 01-10-2010, 09:40 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,133 posts, read 6,181,236 times
Reputation: 4342
Default Senate poll: Coakley up 15 points

Quote:
Democrat Martha Coakley, buoyed by her durable statewide popularity, enjoys a solid, 15-percentage-point lead over Republican rival Scott Brown as the race for US Senate enters the homestretch, according to a new Boston Globe poll of likely voters.

Coakley’s lead grows to 17 points - 53 percent to 36 percent - when undecideds leaning toward a candidate are included in the tally. The results indicate that Brown has a steep hill to climb to pull off an upset in the Jan. 19 election. Indeed, the poll indicated that nearly two-thirds of Brown’s supporters believe Coakley will win.
Quote:
Health care, the economy, and taxes and spending are the most important issues for voters, who trust Coakley more to handle every one. Even on taxes and spending - which have been central to Brown’s campaign - 42 percent of voters said they trust Coakley, compared with 37 percent for Brown.
Senate poll: Coakley up 15 points - The Boston Globe
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 01-10-2010, 09:42 PM
 
15,012 posts, read 17,798,013 times
Reputation: 10318
. . . glad that I didn't send any money to the organization which sent me a fear-gram stating that Coakley was on thin ice . .
__________________
- Please follow our TOS.
- Any Questions about City-Data? See the FAQ list.
- Want some detailed instructions on using the site? See The Guide for plain english explanation.
- Realtors are welcome here but do see our Realtor Advice to avoid infractions.
- Thank you and enjoy City-Data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-10-2010, 09:43 PM
 
Location: Palm Springs, CA
24,551 posts, read 11,669,804 times
Reputation: 5981
Supporters of Scott Brown are saying that the poll showing Coakley winning is a result of "liberal media bias". What else is new?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-10-2010, 09:45 PM
 
17,960 posts, read 6,153,538 times
Reputation: 6164
Hidden deep in the article is the key to understanding this for those who haven't paid attention to politics for the last 38 years:

"...Massachusetts has not sent a Republican to the Senate since Edward Brooke’s reelection in 1972."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-10-2010, 09:52 PM
 
Location: Chicago Suburbs
3,194 posts, read 2,073,184 times
Reputation: 1144
Could get interesting.

Public Policy Polling: Toss up in Massachusetts
Quote:
The Massachusetts Senate race is now a toss up.

Buoyed by a huge advantage with independents and relative disinterest from Democratic voters in the state, Republican Scott Brown leads Martha Coakley 48-47
Quote:
As is pretty predictable I see a lot of folks writing off our poll because the Boston Globe poll, conducted by the University of New Hampshire, has to be more accurate than ours because it was paid for by a newspaper and conducted by a college
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-10-2010, 09:59 PM
 
Location: mancos
5,478 posts, read 2,302,137 times
Reputation: 2118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike from back east View Post
. . . glad that I didn't send any money to the organization which sent me a fear-gram stating that Coakley was on thin ice . .
yeah we did that on purpose and it worked beyond our wildest dreams.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-10-2010, 10:00 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,133 posts, read 6,181,236 times
Reputation: 4342
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Supporters of Scott Brown are saying that the poll showing Coakley winning is a result of "liberal media bias". What else is new?
Republicans are the classic bullies: Push push push, but when they get it back they all become victims. Palin was a pro at it, and so are most of he supporters here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-10-2010, 10:06 PM
 
13,200 posts, read 5,795,995 times
Reputation: 4431
The media pulls this stunt where they make as many races as they can seem close. It builds interest and increases viewership. Their latest storyline is that everything is going downhill for Democrats. IMO you'll see see many of their horse races fall apart as election day approaches and the pollling numbers firm up. The GOP can also kiss Dodd's seat in CT goodbye...It will never happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-10-2010, 10:08 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,226 posts, read 19,557,570 times
Reputation: 6941
The Democrat PPP poll has Brown by 1. Another poll, the Boston Herald reportedly has Coakley by 1.

Let's delve a bit into the globe numbers.

Quote:
In the PPP survey, 44 percent of those polled were Democrats and 39 percent were independents, while the Globe had Democrats outnumbering independents by a nearly 4-to-1 margin, or 56 percent to 15 percent.
Now, I do believe that Independents make up HALF the registered voters in Mass. So a 4-1 margin is a bit much. The Globe only polled 81 Indies.

The PPP has Brown winning big with Indies, the Globe has them about tied.

The PPP also is showing tremendous apathy among democrats - which is a really good thing and if it turns out that democrats stay home, Brown has a chance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-10-2010, 10:10 PM
 
Location: Chicago Suburbs
3,194 posts, read 2,073,184 times
Reputation: 1144
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
The media pulls this stunt where they make as many races as they can seem close. It builds interest and increases viewership. Their latest storyline is that everything is going downhill for Democrats. IMO you'll see see many of their horse races fall apart as election day approaches and the pollling numbers firm up. The GOP can also kiss Dodd's seat in CT goodbye...It will never happen.
The Boston Globe has Coakley(D) up by 15 points, but hey don't let stop you from
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:22 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top