Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Your pull-quote belies the writer's wingnutty point of view, and hence, can be safely ignored.
Exactly who is "floundering?" Coakley is going to win, and she'll win with a very respectful 5 to 10%. That margin is normal for non-incumbant elections in Mass.
It's only the media trying to turn this into a horse race when it isn't.
But some silly people fall for it.
You just have to hope that those sexists in Massachusetts will finally elect a woman to the US senate.
Has anyone christened the term "Bush Derangement Derangement Syndrome" yet? Because this is a good example. President Obama's statements lately have been a recognition that his lower approval ratings are due to one thing: Loss of support among the liberals. They are not happy that President Obama has failed to make enough progress.
So the President's statements lately have been (paraphrasing) "I understand people's frustrations - it takes a long time to make progress. It is taking longer than we thought to correct the terrible problems that were created by the Bush Administration."
Therefore, the moron who wrote the column twists his words into: Bush is to blame for Obama's low approval ratings.
It takes a really stupid person to fall for such "logic."
Maybe if you say "Derangement" three times in a row that will make it go away.
Polls taken every year show that the country is only about 20% liberal, the other 80% or so identifies themselves as moderates or conservative, so it looks like 0bama is holding onto the liberal voters and a few ignorant moderates who do not follow politics.
And it isn't Obama that's making the claim that I made. Where did you get such a silly impression? How is it possible to have a conversation with people who make up things?
Really? I'm making things up? If it was only your opinion as you say, then why did you say this?
Quote:
President Obama's statements lately have been a recognition that his lower approval ratings are due to one thing: Loss of support among the liberals.
So were you simply interpreting his statements for him? ... that his plummeting approval ratings are only due to loss of base support? I would love to see some factual data to support your hypothesis that he is only losing support among liberals. Care to share?
Oh boy. He's really worried about those 3 conservatives who voted for him. He's lost 2 and is at risk to lose the third. How is it possible to have a conversation with people who make up things?
Hilarious nonsense from idahogie. Making things up while in the same post criticizing people who make things up !
Freaking classic.
Have merged at least two threads on this topic. Please do NOT keep starting new threads on Coakley vs Brown.
Find an existing thread and add your posting to that one.
__________________
- Please follow our TOS.
- Any Questions about City-Data? See the FAQ list.
- Want some detailed instructions on using the site? See The Guide for plain english explanation.
- Realtors are welcome here but do see our Realtor Advice to avoid infractions.
- Thank you and enjoy City-Data.
Oh boy. He's really worried about those 3 conservatives who voted for him. He's lost 2 and is at risk to lose the third.
And it isn't Obama that's making the claim that I made. Where did you get such a silly impression? How is it possible to have a conversation with people who make up things?
I know quite a few conservatives that voted for him and quite a few democrats that voted for McCain. Half my family of republicans voted for Obama and now I get to say "I told you so." LOL
I don't think you would consider it porno, but I have some morality and I know it's porno. It's "softcore" porno. Sorry that I don't - ahem - "appreciate" a hairy naked man's picture as you and a lot of Republican "men" do.
That would include the left-wingnuts as well as the right-wingnuts ? I know more than a few democrats who voted for Obama and they are shocked, disappointed and disgusted with the way he and his gang has directed our nation.
This isn't really about Coakley. It's all about holding on to a democrat seat in the Senate. They could care less who gets elected, as long as it's a democrat.
This is about Obama and his agenda, and not about the people, so he doesn't think he's wasting his time. He's sweating the possibility of losing that 60th seat so he can continue delivering the change he envisioned, not the change we were expecting.
I think that enough people in Massachusetts are disappointed with the way things are going that they realize they still have a chance to turn things around and they'll vote to do that. Martha Coakley will be highly partisan and beholden to too many politicians to think of the people much. There are too many of those in Washington now who don't listen to us. Do we really need another one?
Thank you Thank you Thank you, you are so right, this is all about obama and his agenda, and seeing to it that it passes, regardless of how we the People feel aobut it. All about his agenda. I have realitives who live in Mass, they are not happy campers. The Demoquacks had an agenda from the day he got elected, and they are living up to the fact, that this is all about what they want, not what we need.
Exactly who is "floundering?" Coakley is going to win, and she'll win with a very respectful 5 to 10%. That margin is normal for non-incumbant elections in Mass.
It's only the media trying to turn this into a horse race when it isn't.
But some silly people fall for it.
lol. how embarassing for you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
