Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
not trying to hijack, just pointing out the error in your argument. Righties are all about the constitution and getting up that soap box, but they're just as guilty of what you accuse. So you can sit and make a claim that I'm hijacking the thread because you have no explaination or don't want to address it. but it's completely relevent and you know it. it just underminds your position and makes you look foolish
Sorry, a politician is a politician as far as I'm concerned. Either way, 'the rest of America' isn't going to be voting either for or against her - just her own constituents.
boiseguy, I don’t know how you reached the conclusion that I think gays don’t have the same unalienable rights as everyone else. Nevertheless, there are already countless threads on this forum about gay rights. This thread is about Nancy Pelosi, who in my opinion is violating the rights of all Americans, including gays.
It would be a major improvement if the Republicans ran 2nd in Nancy Pelosi's District. They were way behind cindy Sheehan last time. When Obama is reelected, Pelosi will get a Cabinet job and Fiona Ma will take her seat
Actually, America loves checks and balances. Checks and Balances will manage to put Nancy Pelosi back in her place come November. Libs better take advantage of the next 8 months, because that's where the tracks end for this runaway locomotive called Majority Rules Liberalism. Nancy Pelosi will be begging for forgiveness from her Repulican-controlled Senate counterparts. Funny how that works, eh?
I'm with you on this one, GuyDC...she has ticked off too many. Even her home state has begun to turn toward a more conservative slant due to current policy after the wreckage she left. We'll just have to wait and see....tick-tock.
According to a WND/Wenzel Poll conducted by telephone from March 22-24 using an automated telephone technology calling a random sampling of listed telephone numbers nationwide, some 60 percent of the likely voters in her district support her.
Do you think they really did that? Did the really call random numbers nationwide hoping to contact likely voters in her district?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
