Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Europe
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-05-2010, 06:37 AM
 
Location: FIN
888 posts, read 1,591,051 times
Reputation: 811

Advertisements

This must be some kind of sick joke. All career criminals belong six feet under. Why should anyone treat convicted murderers or rapists with respect? Why should they have any kind of human rights? Did they treat their victims with respect and think about their human rights?

I do agree that long-term prison sentences do not work, or shoud i say they serve no purpose. It would be much more safer, and most importantly cheaper, to execute all career criminals as soon as possible with the cheapest possible method.

For smaller crimes, this kind of humane approach with access to work, rehabilitation, and education does work excellently though.

 
Old 05-05-2010, 08:54 AM
 
Location: The cupboard under the sink
3,993 posts, read 8,923,439 times
Reputation: 8105
And how do you define "culturally" Norwegian ?
If you mean what I think you mean, then wouldn't the vast majority of US citizens be "culturally" American ?

Or, are you suggesting that it's only immigrants, and non-whites who break the law in America?
I don't understand what Norway's percentage of immigrant population has to do with crime statistics ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
There are less than 5 million people in Norway, 94% of whom are culturally Norweigan. You don't think that's relevant? Or you think it's still a good comparison? They've even done studies about its genetic homogeneity. Gimme a freakin' break.
 
Old 05-05-2010, 09:43 AM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,388,406 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmptrwlt View Post
Prisoners per capita:
  • USA: 715 per 100,000 people
  • Norway: 64 per 100,000 people
Homocide per capita (2006):
  • USA: 5.7 per 100,000 people
  • Norway: 0.71 per 100,000 people
Looks like the American model is working fine.
you are comparing apples to oranges. Norway has a Gini coefficient of 28 compared to the US' 45. That is far more likely the driver in crime rather then the prison system.
 
Old 05-05-2010, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Flanders, Belgium
268 posts, read 877,755 times
Reputation: 275
50 years ago, the percentage of prisoners was not significantly higher in the US, compared with the UK, a strong punisher in Europe.
In the 80's, the war on drugs introduced the 3 strikes and your ot rule. That rule is becoming common when it comes to other crimes (not only the strictly drugs-related).

Nowadays, the US have 5 times more prisoners in jail! Is crime reduced 5 times too? Don't think so.
Maybe long-term imprisonment isn't that effective???

I prefer effective rehabilitation. Better a murderer 5 years in jail with rehabilitation and not 40 years behind bars.

Nut that is another debate. Other continent, other opinions.
 
Old 05-05-2010, 10:27 AM
 
Location: DF
758 posts, read 2,240,124 times
Reputation: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
you are comparing apples to oranges. Norway has a Gini coefficient of 28 compared to the US' 45. That is far more likely the driver in crime rather then the prison system.
Random... luckily I know what the gini coefficient is, but I think u might have to explain it to people on here.

This is actually key to Norway's low crime rate. The level of inequality in Norway is one of the lowest (I think maybe the lowest? I don't know) and that is many times related to the crime rate. There's obviously huge exceptions, like Mexico, which has the same GINI coefficient (the measure of inequality) as the U.S. but has a much higher incidence of crime. Some African nations are poor all the way around, so that even the wealthy are poor, making for a low gini coefficient. But generally speaking, the countries with the highest GINI (Brazil, ANgola, South Africa) have the highest crime rates while the countries with the lowest GINI (Switzerland, Denmark, Norway) have low crime rates.

Low inequality, coulped with economic prosperity make for low crime rates in Norway. Not the fact that theyre homogenous, or Norwegian, or the fact that they're soft on crime. The same happens throughout all of Europe. Crime rates are much lower in Europe than in the U.S. because inequality is much lower in Europe than in the U.S.

You can argue all day long about the virtues of U.S. economics versus European economics... and I might agree with some. I am simply pointing out the crime stats and their relation to economics.

Last edited by joelaldo; 05-05-2010 at 10:38 AM..
 
Old 05-05-2010, 10:37 AM
 
Location: DF
758 posts, read 2,240,124 times
Reputation: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2360039 View Post
50 years ago, the percentage of prisoners was not significantly higher in the US, compared with the UK, a strong punisher in Europe.
In the 80's, the war on drugs introduced the 3 strikes and your ot rule. That rule is becoming common when it comes to other crimes (not only the strictly drugs-related).

Nowadays, the US have 5 times more prisoners in jail! Is crime reduced 5 times too? Don't think so.
Maybe long-term imprisonment isn't that effective???

I prefer effective rehabilitation. Better a murderer 5 years in jail with rehabilitation and not 40 years behind bars.

Nut that is another debate. Other continent, other opinions.
You're right. The problem is, we have a mentality that is more or less on par with radical islam when it comes to punishment, lol. We seek an eye for an eye. We have the most severe punishments for criminals in the developed world. Other countries with similar structures: Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afhanistan, Egypt, Sudan, Somalia, Congo, Zimbabwe, China, North Korea, Vietnam... doesn't the U.S. seem just a little out of place among those countries.
 
Old 05-05-2010, 10:43 AM
 
13,648 posts, read 20,767,629 times
Reputation: 7650
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2360039 View Post
50 years ago, the percentage of prisoners was not significantly higher in the US, compared with the UK, a strong punisher in Europe.
In the 80's, the war on drugs introduced the 3 strikes and your ot rule. That rule is becoming common when it comes to other crimes (not only the strictly drugs-related).

Nowadays, the US have 5 times more prisoners in jail! Is crime reduced 5 times too? Don't think so.
Maybe long-term imprisonment isn't that effective???

I prefer effective rehabilitation. Better a murderer 5 years in jail with rehabilitation and not 40 years behind bars.

Nut that is another debate. Other continent, other opinions.
Your point about three strikes is valid, although there is more to the subject than just that.

A friend from Denmark used to say much the same thing about rehabilitation. We would laugh as we imagined our bespectacled and earnest Dane sitting in a circle with muscled thugs telling them to get in touch with their feelings. They would have strangled him on the spot.

"Rehabilitation" invokes images of Malcolm McDowell strapped down in a chair and being socialized with images. That's a movie of course, but what does Rehabilitation mean? Crime arises, IMHO, from an upbringing that was devoid of vital limits and boundaries, most notably personal responsibility and structured/sane family planning.

If said crimiinals were not taught it as children, how are they going to embrace it as adults after the damage has been done? The State cannot serve as Mommy or Daddy, especially 18 to 30 years later. Bureacrats can barely run their communities with proper efficiency. How are they going to engage in social engineering?

Comparing Norway to the US or UK is just silly. Yes, a 94 percent homogenous population means everything. It means Norway is a static society characterized by conformity and continuity that results in a default social stability. The US and UK are dynamic societies characterized by flux which sometimes strays into chaos. Both have been that way for hundreds of years. How could they possibly emulate Norway?

And that is not to say one is better than the other. Personally, I like the melting pot and the diversity it entails. Norway is obviously a succesful country, but its a different place. Its full of Norwegians.
 
Old 05-05-2010, 10:49 AM
 
Location: DF
758 posts, read 2,240,124 times
Reputation: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moth View Post
Comparing Norway to the US or UK is just silly. Yes, a 94 percent homogenous population means everything. .

So by that logic, Somalia, North Korea, many Arab countries, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos,... should also have low crime rates.
 
Old 05-05-2010, 11:00 AM
 
13,648 posts, read 20,767,629 times
Reputation: 7650
Quote:
Originally Posted by joelaldo View Post
So by that logic, Somalia, North Korea, many Arab countries, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos,... should also have low crime rates.
Some of those do have low crime rates, but for different reasons.

I am comparing Norway to the US and UK, not to those places, which are a completely different story. However, as the US, UK, and Norway are all more or less great places to live, you do indirectly raise a good, but different point:

If Norway is so great (and it is) why don't people admonish North Korea, many Arab countries, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and other basket cases to emulate Norway?

I ask that constantly and have NEVER received an answer.
 
Old 05-05-2010, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Østenfor sol og vestenfor måne
17,916 posts, read 24,336,832 times
Reputation: 39037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moth View Post
Comparing Norway to the US or UK is just silly. Yes, a 94 percent homogenous population means everything. It means Norway is a static society characterized by conformity and continuity that results in a default social stability.
I suspect the majority of criminals in Norway are residents of its largest city, Oslo. Oslo is hardly 94% culturally Norwegian. More like 75% AND PLUMMETING.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Europe

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top