City-Data Forum Does this give the same results? (treadmill, reduce, gain, burns)
 User Name Remember Me Password [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.

01-14-2012, 07:58 AM
 573 posts, read 1,623,860 times Reputation: 312

losing 1,200 calories- day1- 600 calories, day2- 600 calories
vs
day1- 500 calories, day2- 500 calories, day3- 200 calories

will I get the same results? exercise being done is treadmill and a little elliptical

01-14-2012, 08:43 AM
 Location: In a house 13,262 posts, read 34,298,028 times Reputation: 20198
No, it's not the same. Extend your examples and decide for yourself:

Let's say I want to lose 20 pounds.

One pound = 3500 calories.

Previous average daily diet = 2000 calories.
Previous average energy consumption (exercise) = 1000 calories
Previous total gain = 1000 calories/day, which accumulates to
1 pound gain every 3.5 days

Now - I can:
Stop eating entirely and continue exercising. Zero calories in, 1000 calories out, that would give me 1 pound lost every 3.5 days.

Or I can..oh wait. Hm. Something isn't working. How can I starve, and exercise, and only lose 1 pound every 3.5 days?

Simple: Our bodies are not calculators. They're organic life forms with metabolisms that change when our intake changes.

If you do "x" every day, without changing, ever, you might possibly result in "y." Or, you might not result in anything. Or you might result in Y on day 3, and Z on day 5, and R on day 27.

It also depends on what you're putting into those calories you're consuming. If you're consuming 500 fewer calories of sugar, then you might see some positive results. If you're adding non-calorie salt to your diet to the tune of 1000 mg per day, you might see some negative results. If you're eliminating 500 calories of lean proteins, healthy fats, but maintaining the rest with starches and sugars, you might see negative results. If you reverse it, and reduce your starches and sugars, while maintaining your lean proteins and healthy fats, you might see positive results.

If you consistently keep your portions modest, consistently do -some- exercise that burns off calories, consistently expend more energy than you consume, you will find results over an extended period of time.

Trying to micro-manage your weight loss will result in nothing but failed attempts and frustration.

01-14-2012, 11:25 AM
 Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico 2,117 posts, read 4,537,991 times Reputation: 1522
good post anonperson

01-15-2012, 03:21 PM
 4,891 posts, read 8,925,789 times Reputation: 8365
Quote:
 Originally Posted by tommodonahue good post anonperson
Agreed!
That's some handful of info that was dropped.
...and I actually understood it.
Most of the time that technical stuff gets me lost.
All mumbo jumbo
Not that one--I got it.
Kool!
Reps a plenty on the way
 Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over \$68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.