Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I choose none of the above and I hope you’re not a Ken doll as they ain't packing any gear...
Speaking of the poll...I find the results interesting...
The two leading options are
1.Roughneck, mechanic types
2.Polished....
With I think Yuppie/casual in close third...
What that tells me is that women like clear cut definition in their men...
Notice how the two extremes lead in the polls...either smooth polished Oceans Eleven type of guy (George Clooney), or rough tough Stevie Austin type (WCW wrestler)
That tells me that the majority of women want to know who their man is, they want a clear definition of who they're with....
They don't want their man to be tough as leather one day...
And then the next day sitting on the couch crying over an emotional episode of the Oprah show...
Women want 'clarity' in their men...regardless of which extreme...they just seem to want 'clarity....interesting...
I suggest you never get married....its a total female thing that doesn't stop with dating.
See, I don't agree with this. I do consider their character as well as how they dress themselves. If I have a problem with how they dress themselves, then I don't pursue it because that is part of who they are. It's not for me to change, it's for me to accept or leave.
Personally I would not want a Ken doll. How boring. And those types, in my personal experience, (please re-read that), tend to be rather uptight.
A look I personally do not like is the never gone baseball cap. It's on, all the time, never taken off. It's like an accessory that is worn no matter where they go, no matter the event. Drives me crazy.
BUT, if that is what makes them happy, who am I to change that? I let them find someone who doesn't mind it and I move on.
My ideal babe is a cute looking 'Tom boy'...feminine, but rugged...
Why?
Cause I value a babe who is versatile...in other words, the more versatile one is in a relationship, the least likely you'll have to look elsewhere for recreational fun...
I value a woman who like to camp now and then, not afraid to canoue or white water rafting...
A woman whom basically would do anything with me a theoretical best male friend would do...
(why so many males are gay now...think about it)...
And still be cute, soft and feminine....
Now it only makes sense that the opposite of a Tom boy would be a Tom girl...
In other words, a male, who has range...can go shopping with a female, comment on fashion, enjoy a good love novel ect ect...but still retains his 'rambo side' when occasion calls for it...
To me, it would give a relationship more wholeness...make it more round....
But instead women insist on one dimensional men (cause it serves their ego)...
And guys insist on one dimensional women (cause it serves their lust)....
Thus you have all these relationships and marriages that fizz out after a few months or years...
What I just wrote is very cutting edge...if some renowned phycologist said it, or wrote a thesis on it, they'd be hailed as 'brilliant' or this or that...
But instead, I said it...and thus it will be buried in Time and Space...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.