U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
View Poll Results: What body types look more attractive for both genders/more reasonable?
The painting 26 76.47%
What is idealized today 8 23.53%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Unread 02-16-2012, 08:30 AM
 
Location: US
4,847 posts, read 2,414,130 times
Reputation: 4627
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnexpectedError View Post
I don't have to think about it for a minute because I test women's estrogen and testosterone levels every day. The women with the highest testosterone levels I've seen have been the fattest.

Women who work out excessively or any woman with low body fat may experience low estrogen and cessation of menstruation because they do not have adequate body fat for their ovaries to produce estradiol, not because their testosterone levels have increased. The ovaries are also responsible for testosterone production in women and a woman with very low body fat may experience lower testosterone levels than normal, not higher. Extremely obese women may have high levels or estrogen and high levels of testosterone. If a woman who works out excessively has high testosterone, it isn't because she has low body fat/estrogen, it's because she's taking hormone supplements or has an underlying condition that is raising her androgen levels.
This is because it raises the estrogen (fat) and then the testosterone tries to balance itself out back to normal. Kinda neat in a way. Interesting share!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 02-16-2012, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Wherever women are
19,029 posts, read 12,625,984 times
Reputation: 11309
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnexpectedError View Post
I don't have to think about it for a minute because I test women's estrogen and testosterone levels every day. The women with the highest testosterone levels I've seen have been the fattest.

Women who work out excessively or any woman with low body fat may experience low estrogen and cessation of menstruation because they do not have adequate body fat for their ovaries to produce estradiol, not because their testosterone levels have increased. The ovaries are also responsible for testosterone production in women and a woman with very low body fat may experience lower testosterone levels than normal, not higher. Extremely obese women may have high levels or estrogen and high levels of testosterone. If a woman who works out excessively has high testosterone, it isn't because she has low body fat/estrogen, it's because she's taking hormone supplements or has an underlying condition that is raising her androgen levels.
Curvy girls. Killer assets. High sex drive. It's a crocodile park.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-16-2012, 12:15 PM
 
3,501 posts, read 1,320,753 times
Reputation: 5118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Currency Pair Crocodile View Post
Curvy girls. Killer assets. High sex drive. It's a crocodile park.
Ha, just hope you like them with acne and moustaches as well. And I suspect the kind of curves you prefer aren't circular. Too many of the women I see could be conveniently rolled down the hall if they fell over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-16-2012, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Wherever women are
19,029 posts, read 12,625,984 times
Reputation: 11309
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnexpectedError View Post
Ha, just hope you like them with acne and moustaches as well. And I suspect the kind of curves you prefer aren't circular. Too many of the women I see could be conveniently rolled down the hall if they fell over.
I go on a case by case basis. It's impossible to define my definition of "curvy". It's a concept and it's accentuated on three focal points, like an ellipse has two. Eyes, brains and the Marquis. The determinant is computed insitu and on the fly. Words can't describe.

It also seems you and Ops are heavily biased against your "fleshier" sisters. That's an unexpected error.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-16-2012, 12:32 PM
 
Location: SoCal - Sherman Oaks & Woodland Hills
12,984 posts, read 17,055,566 times
Reputation: 10491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Currency Pair Crocodile View Post
I go on a case by case basis. It's impossible to define my definition of "curvy". It's a concept and it's accentuated on three focal points, like an ellipse has two. Eyes, brains and the Marquis. The determinant is computed insitu and on the fly. Words can't describe.

It also seems you and Ops are heavily biased against your "fleshier" sisters. That's an unexpected error.
LOL. I love this post.

I actually agree with you kinda. I know what I like, but because women's bodies come in so many different shapes and sizes, I find it easier to just say what I DO NOT like. Just think of how different the bodies are of say pre-baby having J-Lo, Kim Kardashian, Zuzana workout chick, Katy Perry, Beyonce, Allesandra Abrosio, Trish Stratus, any female olympic sprinter/hurdler, Alexis Texas, etc. All with almost completely different bodies, but yet all very very very attractive and bodies that make you say WOW!!!

I dont like fat chicks. I dont like bodybuilding chicks. I dont like chicks with flat or no a$$es.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-16-2012, 12:39 PM
 
Location: US
4,847 posts, read 2,414,130 times
Reputation: 4627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Currency Pair Crocodile View Post
I go on a case by case basis. It's impossible to define my definition of "curvy". It's a concept and it's accentuated on three focal points, like an ellipse has two. Eyes, brains and the Marquis. The determinant is computed insitu and on the fly. Words can't describe.

It also seems you and Ops are heavily biased against your "fleshier" sisters. That's an unexpected error.
Oh now...I just don't see the point of wasting food. When you overeat to the point of health problems...that is a waste of food and your life.

Not to mention the planets natural resources...another thread...another time.

Honestly I think we just SEE fat that is there because we are not that heavy. I am assuming from the other posters history that she is not.
I will never advocate unhealthy weights on either side of the spectrum. If a woman truly loves her body she does not treat it like a dumpster. I just really hate the "unhealthy fat embrace" movement that is ever so popular these days.

Its selling people a lie and also slamming those who are the "ideal".
Its not a movement of love or education. Its just a big pile of PC BS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-16-2012, 12:45 PM
 
3,501 posts, read 1,320,753 times
Reputation: 5118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Currency Pair Crocodile View Post
I go on a case by case basis. It's impossible to define my definition of "curvy". It's a concept and it's accentuated on three focal points, like an ellipse has two. Eyes, brains and the Marquis. The determinant is computed insitu and on the fly. Words can't describe.

It also seems you and Ops are heavily biased against your "fleshier" sisters. That's an unexpected error.
I've come across too many online convos between a large group of people all sitting around agreeing that skinny women are gross and unattractive. When bitten, I bite back.

But I like to think I stay pretty level headed in my posts, stick to the facts without using purposely derogatory language. At least when it comes to weight. I shall emotionally and psychologically destroy the munchkins who speak against the tall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-16-2012, 12:52 PM
 
Location: US
4,847 posts, read 2,414,130 times
Reputation: 4627
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnexpectedError View Post
I've come across too many online convos between a large group of people all sitting around agreeing that skinny women are gross and unattractive. When bitten, I bite back.

But I like to think I stay pretty level headed in my posts, stick to the facts without using purposely derogatory language. At least when it comes to weight. I shall emotionally and psychologically destroy the munchkins who speak against the tall.

LOL...

I know right?
Double standard!

For me its not about biting though. Its about stopping the BS that being heavy is healthy and that stupid body acceptance movement. "ACCEPT DIABETES AND HEART DISEASE AND BUY THIS LOTION THAT LOVES YOU JUST AS YOU ARE! "

*dove* cough *dove*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-16-2012, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Wherever women are
19,029 posts, read 12,625,984 times
Reputation: 11309
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaoTzuMindFu View Post
LOL. I love this post.

I actually agree with you kinda. I know what I like, but because women's bodies come in so many different shapes and sizes, I find it easier to just say what I DO NOT like. Just think of how different the bodies are of say pre-baby having J-Lo, Kim Kardashian, Zuzana workout chick, Katy Perry, Beyonce, Allesandra Abrosio, Trish Stratus, any female olympic sprinter/hurdler, Alexis Texas, etc. All with almost completely different bodies, but yet all very very very attractive and bodies that make you say WOW!!!

I dont like fat chicks. I dont like bodybuilding chicks. I dont like chicks with flat or no a$$es.
Individual preference varies.

But I like real women on the road, who live their life on a day by day basis.

Those women are creations of a system which makes them, then breaks them to make new ones. It's not to be confused with feminine beauty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-16-2012, 12:56 PM
 
3,501 posts, read 1,320,753 times
Reputation: 5118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Currency Pair Crocodile View Post
Individual preference varies.

But I like real women on the road, who live their life on a day by day basis.

Those women are creations of a system which makes them, then breaks them to make new ones. It's not to be confused with feminine beauty.
Hey, at least they're recycling, right?

P.S. I'm a real woman. I'm also 6'0, 33-23-34.5 but I'm real.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top