U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-05-2012, 08:37 PM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,683 posts, read 43,321,611 times
Reputation: 11862

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by artemis agrotera View Post
more pictures required




^ a plus of watching Aussie Rules, is their physique.
Definitely look better than those tanks who play rugby!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-05-2012, 09:14 PM
 
14,790 posts, read 13,516,464 times
Reputation: 20482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trimac20 View Post
Definitely look better than those tanks who play rugby!
ha. Yeah, Not quite like this:

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2012, 09:17 PM
 
Location: Up in the air
19,126 posts, read 25,854,868 times
Reputation: 16226
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Damn, JJ, those are some big a$$ baseball players. Certainly above average for MLB, no?

Yep, a quick Google search turns up the average size of about 6'1" and 196 lbs for MLB players as of '09.

Just for fun, as of '08, NBA players averaged about 6'7" and about 222lbs. NFL, circa 2006, avg weight was 248, per an ESPN article - can't seem to track down avg height for NFL players. Average NHL player is about 6'1" and 205lbs.
They're mostly pitchers....pitchers are usually way taller/bigger than the rest of the team. I just asked my brother why that is and he said 'bigger you are, the longer your limbs are and the more power you put into throwing'. Makes sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2012, 09:37 PM
 
Location: Virginia
2,482 posts, read 2,619,410 times
Reputation: 1886
It would be nice to be that fit, I guess I better settle for whatever shape I can acheive lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2012, 09:37 PM
 
1,592 posts, read 2,870,900 times
Reputation: 2128
Quote:
Originally Posted by SameOne View Post
Rashad is 5' 11" 205. Chuck is 6' 2" 205.
It doesn't end well for Chuck!




Chuck Liddell Knocked OUT by Rashad Evens - YouTube
First of all, Chuck Liddell beat many guys who were shorter than him. Also, all the main MMA champs right now are pretty damn tall. Secondly, Chuck doesn't exactly look small or skinny to me.

Back on topic...I hear Chuck was quite popular with the ladies. The way he looks seems to coincide with many of the preferences listed so far.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2012, 10:44 PM
 
2,590 posts, read 3,159,417 times
Reputation: 6707
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetJockey View Post
And neither are most of the guys being posted on this thread.

That's kind of the point.

But at least you guys, in theory, could just work out and get there.

Instead, guys more often want the ladies to wax their entire body, surgically implant some watermelons in their chest, remove a rib or two, be skinny and yet retain a volumptuous ass (I guess more implants?).

The female ideal is painful, expensive and generally unattainable via natural means. Genetics is a fickle creature.

You guys are lucky that when it comes down to appearances, woman just aren't as picky.

All in good fun boys. All in good fun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2012, 11:29 PM
 
3,517 posts, read 5,459,245 times
Reputation: 5566
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfcambridge View Post
But at least you guys, in theory, could just work out and get there.

Instead, guys more often want the ladies to wax their entire body, surgically implant some watermelons in their chest, remove a rib or two, be skinny and yet retain a volumptuous ass (I guess more implants?).

The female ideal is painful, expensive and generally unattainable via natural means. Genetics is a fickle creature.

You guys are lucky that when it comes down to appearances, woman just aren't as picky.

All in good fun boys. All in good fun.
Lucky for the human race, attaining the physical ideal has never been necessary in order to find happiness, love, or a mate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2012, 11:31 PM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
26,919 posts, read 28,270,165 times
Reputation: 26104
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfcambridge View Post
But at least you guys, in theory, could just work out and get there.

Instead, guys more often want the ladies to wax their entire body, surgically implant some watermelons in their chest, remove a rib or two, be skinny and yet retain a volumptuous ass (I guess more implants?).

The female ideal is painful, expensive and generally unattainable via natural means. Genetics is a fickle creature.

You guys are lucky that when it comes down to appearances, woman just aren't as picky.

All in good fun boys. All in good fun.
Yup, a handful of women win the genetic lottery and have large perky breasts, a small flat waist, curvy hips with thin, yet shapely legs and a round butt. Other women get one of these features and just work with what they have, never reaching the "feminine ideal." and other people end up somewhere else on the scale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2012, 12:29 AM
 
1,171 posts, read 1,650,381 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1208 View Post
First of all, Chuck Liddell beat many guys who were shorter than him. Also, all the main MMA champs right now are pretty damn tall. Secondly, Chuck doesn't exactly look small or skinny to me.

Back on topic...I hear Chuck was quite popular with the ladies. The way he looks seems to coincide with many of the preferences listed so far.
I know he beat many. He retired after that fight moreless. He got knocked a good one. One that he never recovered fully from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2012, 02:23 AM
 
Location: Up in the air
19,126 posts, read 25,854,868 times
Reputation: 16226
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1208 View Post
First of all, Chuck Liddell beat many guys who were shorter than him. Also, all the main MMA champs right now are pretty damn tall. Secondly, Chuck doesn't exactly look small or skinny to me.

Back on topic...I hear Chuck was quite popular with the ladies. The way he looks seems to coincide with many of the preferences listed so far.
Chuck Liddell is from my town...and I will tell you right now that he's a grade A douche. He's usually seen at a particular bar downtown, acting tough, trying to start fights, bragging about how great he is and drunkenly hitting on 21 year old college girls. Nearly everyone I know has met him at least once and not one of them has anything good to say.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sfcambridge View Post
But at least you guys, in theory, could just work out and get there.

Instead, guys more often want the ladies to wax their entire body, surgically implant some watermelons in their chest, remove a rib or two, be skinny and yet retain a volumptuous ass (I guess more implants?).

The female ideal is painful, expensive and generally unattainable via natural means. Genetics is a fickle creature.

You guys are lucky that when it comes down to appearances, woman just aren't as picky.

All in good fun boys. All in good fun.
Considering I'm a woman, I'd like to think I know all about what women have to do to be attractive
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top