Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-30-2013, 08:51 AM
 
Location: SGV, CA
808 posts, read 1,877,633 times
Reputation: 1276

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by angrymillionaire View Post
I've always thought with that kind of money, stylists etc just about anybody would be drop dead gorgeous.
This right here. Mila Kunis is just straight up unattractive without makeup. Bradley Cooper is very handsome, although I don't like blue eyes on men.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-30-2013, 10:29 AM
 
Location: all over the place (figuratively)
6,616 posts, read 4,875,202 times
Reputation: 3601
Yeah, it's true that Garbo, Bette Davis, and such didn't have naturally attractive faces. My suspicion that overrating is a recent trend likely is false.

I wonder if some of the hype is pandering to audiences. "With a few changes, you, middle-aged woman, could be quite pretty like [this naturally unspectacular aging celebrity]." Less about actually prompting those changes than building allegiance through commonality and flattery. Maybe the (lesser) overrating of male celebrities is an extension of that, meant to build female viewers' hopes of landing "hot" guys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 10:37 AM
 
Location: NY
9,131 posts, read 20,000,438 times
Reputation: 11707
What "media" are we talking about here? The same media which is meant to hype these very actors and actresses so that people want to see more of them, buy the products they pitch, etc?

It is all part of the marketing of them and everything they are involved with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 11:06 AM
 
4,038 posts, read 4,860,904 times
Reputation: 5353
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodheathen View Post
Mila Kunis and Bradley Cooper are two of many celebrities who often are called great-looking by the media when anyone should be able to tell that they're nothing special. Why do you think the media often exaggerates the attractiveness of famous people?
I'm glad someone finally started a thread about this! Jennifer Aniston has always looked pretty average to me, and I could name a few others. It's all about the Hollywood PR machine. Selling celebs helps sell the films they appear in. It's ALL about the bottom line!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 11:47 AM
 
Location: On the corner of Grey Street
6,126 posts, read 10,104,160 times
Reputation: 11796
I think it's because they want celebrities to be seen as glamorous and beautiful so people will want to copy them and buy products they endorse and of course go see their movies, watch their TV shows, and buy their CD's, etc. There are a few truly beautiful celebrities out there, but overall most of them are likely as average as anyone else. I could look as good as a celebrity too if I had people dressing me, taking care of my skin and hair, doing my makeup and nails everyday. Not only that but there are chefs preparing all their healthy meals and personal trainers helping them work out to get great bodies. It's basically their job to look good and they have the money and staff to make it happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 12:05 PM
 
7,413 posts, read 6,225,470 times
Reputation: 6665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueoceansandclearskies View Post
I think there are two types of beautiful women. There are the cute ones and the sexy ones. The sexy ones are like Angeline Jolie, Megan Fox, ScarJo, Adriana Lima, Amber Heard etc. The cute ones are like Taylor Swift, Kirsten Dunst, Selena Gomez, Emma Watson. Personally, I don't find the "cute ones" to be attractive, but many people don't find the "sexy" ones to be attractive. I've noticed this trend.
I've always thought that Taylor Swift was kind of dorky and awkward. As for the rest of your list, I agree.

I think some gals can pull off being both cute and sexy, like Emily Blunt, Rachel McAdams and Katy Perry types.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 12:54 PM
 
Location: all over the place (figuratively)
6,616 posts, read 4,875,202 times
Reputation: 3601
Katy Perry is very overrated. It's almost all trickery.

Jennifer Aniston isn't really a beauty, but her face and body are nice and she's aging unusually well. I think most of the hype is about how well-preserved she is. (When she was younger and a bit better-looking, only her hair was a big topic.)

At the same time, Aniston is a fine example of how beauty hype doesn't sell movies. It probably doesn't increase viewership of stars' shows, either. Therefore, I doubt the media's inflated ratings are much intended to sell films and the stars' TV series.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 01:40 PM
 
50,721 posts, read 36,411,320 times
Reputation: 76531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metaphysique View Post
I think both are very attractive. *shrug*
So do I.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 01:56 PM
 
Location: all over the place (figuratively)
6,616 posts, read 4,875,202 times
Reputation: 3601
There's no reason to sidetrack this with a debate over Mila Kunis. Google her "without makeup" - that's proof she is average-looking at best.

Edit: I just remembered one theory about overrated celebrities. That their popularity is based in part on looking non-threatening. Maybe to teens and women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 02:51 PM
 
4,716 posts, read 5,956,682 times
Reputation: 2190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueoceansandclearskies View Post
When you don't see someone up close and you don't see how they live and what they look like everyday (and you see them always looking perfect and photoshopped), you start to think they're amazing. But if you were to meet one of these people and get to know them, I'm sure the awe would fade incredibly fast. There are some celebs that I also don't understand the hype about. For example, when Gwyneth Paltrow was voted most beautiful woman on the planet…I was like "there are better looking girls in the supermarket."
The major celebrities can also afford any army of help - a personal trainer or two, a dietitian, a makeup person, a hair stylist, fashion designer, etc. - to make them look better.

That's before you get Photoshop involved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top