Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The point of a wedding dress is to show off the bride's best attributes. Some young women have lovely breasts and some don't. Some have a nice booty, and some don't. Some are so modest they would prefer to wear a white burqua, and others would be happier in a few patches of strategically placed lace. I'm pleased to look at any young woman, regardless of how she chooses to present herself.
That's not the purpose of a wedding dress at all. She tries to look beautiful for herself and for her groom to appreciate how beautiful she looks, not to show off her attributes.
Interesting thread when I first walked by here, I thought OP was trolling I could not imagine a wedding dress with sleeves then I saw pics & yup most are nice. Funny I had never even heard of it!
I got married in 1996 and every gown had sleeves. This sleeveless wedding gown is a relatively new thing. Surely you grandmother wore sleeves! It would have been incredibly inappropriate and considered rude not to!
No particular reason. Just a vent. EVERY wedding dress I see on TV, reality show, or contemporary show shows wedding dresses with bodices (and cleavage of course) and no sleeves. It's kind of gotten to be quite boring in style. You can do a lot with sleeves. Bring back sleeves!
It is the fashion now for wedding dresses to be without straps or sleeves, neither of which I like.
Since I am already married though I don't care but if I was going to get married and did find a dress I like without sleeves I would simply have them added and pay any extra charge there would be.
Most weddings I've been to have been in the summer or spring, so the bride chose to dress accordingly.
Whenever the time comes, I think I'd prefer a sleeveless dress. I'm a 5'10" beanpole and I don't think sleeves would look so good on my ridiculously long arms.
The point of a wedding dress is to show off the bride's best attributes. Some young women have lovely breasts and some don't. Some have a nice booty, and some don't. Some are so modest they would prefer to wear a white burqua, and others would be happier in a few patches of strategically placed lace. I'm pleased to look at any young woman, regardless of how she chooses to present herself.
No, it is not the point of a wedding dress to show off the bride's "attributes". The attributes should be revealed behind closed doors later.... kind of like unwrapping a present.
Back in the day, when people had decorum, a priest or minister would never perform a wedding unless the bride was modestly covered.
I think it is much lovelier for a bride to dress like a princess, and not like a street walker.
The point of a wedding dress is to show off the bride's best attributes. Some young women have lovely breasts and some don't. Some have a nice booty, and some don't. Some are so modest they would prefer to wear a white burqua, and others would be happier in a few patches of strategically placed lace. I'm pleased to look at any young woman, regardless of how she chooses to present herself.
Ummmm, yeah, the best attributes, right. Gotta emphasize that booty and push out those breasts!
If she's looking for a divorce on grounds of adultery in few years, go get 'um.
She is an attractive woman but I'm not sure her dress was an indication of innate "class." She married into a Orthodox Jewish family so her conservative wedding dress (which was, to my taste, stunning) was appropriate for the faith to which she converted.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.