Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm going with David Giuntoli of "GRIMM". I happened to walk right past him in a bookstore one day and he is even better-looking in person, if that's possible. Even if I hadn't recognized him he still would have taken my breath away.
Paul Walker and Channing Tatum (and maybe even Bradley Cooper) are the same guy, I swear.
They're certainly not ugly guys, but that's about it. They're not ridiculously gorgeous. I just don't get it.
A strong and obvious sense of humor and less non-stop brooding (like maybe smiling more than twice a year) would work wonders.
It's the guy that should be appealing, NOT THE MOVIE ROLE HE PLAYS. Some of the comments on here are equating "male beauty" with an attractive-to-female-viewers movie role he played. And I'd bet I speak for most men.
Many of us guys all argued the same thing about Kevin Costner 25 years ago. He looks like a decent-looking manager of a grocery store yet women went ga-ga for him. He is not male beauty.
I saw a Chris Hemsworth movie with my wife recently. Now with him I understand the fuss. So not fair.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
