U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-06-2014, 01:43 PM
 
Location: NYC
11,818 posts, read 7,695,291 times
Reputation: 12811

Advertisements

I noticed the last few years this new surge or trend in excessively wide or inflated behinds. I do not for one bit think Kim's nor Nicki Minaj's rears are 100% natural. As someone who works out 2-3 times a day in the gym I've seen some really gorgeous and heavy toned female rears and they do not pack that much luggage in the back or sides as some of these new curvaceous females in the spotlight.

As for why I don't think they're real because it doesn't seem natural or medically possibly for someone to have rears that protrude so much and not the fat distribution elsewhere in their bodies. Only explanation is they've received some surgical manipulation.

The question is for females, is this what women want? To walk around and look like a donkey and get cat calls from the likes of construction workers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-06-2014, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Encino, CA
3,417 posts, read 2,895,243 times
Reputation: 5789
Kim has always had a body like that even back in high school. I know because Ive seen it first hand over all these years. And, yes, its real. Dont know about Minaj as I am not a fan of hers, nor have I seen her out and about at the gym, restaraunts, etc. over the course of many years like I have with Kim.

When you say excessively wide or inflated behinds you probably have to say that poor diet, lack of exercise and laziness is to blame. Not the Kardashian clan.

Most of the KK type booties I see around lately can be "blamed" on Crossfit and dedication to health/fitness. Kim's is just natural and what most women who workout try to look like (small waist, flat stomach, rounmd booty, etc) but most women as we see from the crossfit games get booties like that from working out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Birmingham
11,790 posts, read 12,635,810 times
Reputation: 10007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kings Gambit View Post
Kim has always had a body like that even back in high school.
No way. There's pictures galleries of her year by year online. I agree, she's always had a butt, but back around 2006-2007 was when she decided to megasize it. Unless there is some sort of natural macromastia condition for butts, she's had some help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Austin Texas
474 posts, read 739,808 times
Reputation: 531
I think they are both just fat. Yes. KK is fat. Minaj is hideous in every which way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 03:38 PM
 
Location: Somewhere flat in Mississippi
8,609 posts, read 8,614,769 times
Reputation: 5997
Forget the Illuminati. The Kardashians are to blame for EVERYTHING!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 04:20 PM
 
14,649 posts, read 29,692,844 times
Reputation: 17211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mouldy Old Schmo View Post
Forget the Illuminati. The Kardashians are to blame for EVERYTHING!
LOL - I'm in agreeance with that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 05:17 PM
 
Location: NYC
11,818 posts, read 7,695,291 times
Reputation: 12811
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazznblues View Post
I think they are both just fat. Yes. KK is fat. Minaj is hideous in every which way.
Still wondering how they have legions of female fans. Are they really that looked upon?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 05:29 PM
 
17,158 posts, read 22,167,733 times
Reputation: 31223
nothing wrong with a little marbling , makes for a good cushion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 05:36 PM
 
1,406 posts, read 2,316,077 times
Reputation: 1413
I didn't even read the original question/comment, but YES the Kardashians are to be blamed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 05:44 PM
 
Location: North Shore Long Island
7,736 posts, read 13,964,660 times
Reputation: 10544
Quote:
Originally Posted by vision33r View Post
Still wondering how they have legions of female fans. Are they really that looked upon?



Nowadays, most females I know mock them. There was a time when Kim was considered an exotic beauty, but she's had too much work done. And her fashion sense is lacking these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top