U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2015, 07:30 PM
 
Location: lake zurich, il
2,943 posts, read 2,304,948 times
Reputation: 972

Advertisements

A ton of the dresses women are wearing at the Golden Globes are not very nice looking. A lot of them have an incredibly large cut up the middle front to show the leg. If it was any higher you would see their underwear. Also the cleavage on many dresses is seemingly practically down to their belly buttons. Is this what is considered attractive these days? Why do women feel the need to push the boundaries on what is socially acceptable? I'm no prude it just seems strange and unattractive in my opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2015, 07:31 PM
 
2,541 posts, read 2,026,210 times
Reputation: 3814
Jennifer Lopez looks hideous...cheap. Don't these women realize they look trashy with their breasts bulging out like that? Seems like everything she does publicly is done with the intention of attracting attention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2015, 09:25 PM
 
11,161 posts, read 6,642,330 times
Reputation: 20199
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohKnip View Post
A ton of the dresses women are wearing at the Golden Globes are not very nice looking. A lot of them have an incredibly large cut up the middle front to show the leg. If it was any higher you would see their underwear. Also the cleavage on many dresses is seemingly practically down to their belly buttons. Is this what is considered attractive these days? Why do women feel the need to push the boundaries on what is socially acceptable? I'm no prude it just seems strange and unattractive in my opinion.
And I was thinking a lot of the women's dresses looked frumpy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2015, 10:15 PM
 
Location: Pa
42,565 posts, read 42,534,781 times
Reputation: 24879
Jennifer Aniston looked very classy in her high black dress with spaghetti straps.Kate Hudson looked classy and sexy in her white dress.Kloe Kardashian looked hot interviewing with the E cast.The chick who played Cinderella in the movie Into the Woods had a very pretty dress on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2015, 06:54 PM
 
Location: The State Line
2,208 posts, read 3,023,698 times
Reputation: 2477
I literally thought Jennifer Lopez was [this] close to showing nipple.

Jennifer Anniston's dress was a wee bit short in front, while Poehler's blouse was "out there."

Just my humble opinion of course.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2015, 07:15 PM
 
Location: NW AR
2,438 posts, read 2,047,318 times
Reputation: 2250
I think I would trade this one for an iphone5.

http://www.blogcdn.com/slideshows/im...arrivals-1.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2015, 07:16 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, originally from SF Bay Area
28,514 posts, read 50,877,777 times
Reputation: 28900
Professional actresses and singers are in the business of drawing attention to themselves. Outdoing each other on the percentage of skin showing is just one standing out from the others (literally), and has been going on a long time. I suppose we should expect to see a bit more every year as time goes on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2015, 09:50 AM
 
Location: East Coast
2,879 posts, read 4,404,392 times
Reputation: 4181
Quote:
Originally Posted by thegreenflute334 View Post
I think I would trade this one for an iphone5.

http://www.blogcdn.com/slideshows/im...arrivals-1.jpg
Yeah, what was up with that dress? I know she's pregnant, but still...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2015, 09:18 PM
 
Location: Upstate NY
30,704 posts, read 9,178,500 times
Reputation: 29211
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanCrossroads View Post
Jennifer Lopez looks hideous...cheap. Don't these women realize they look trashy with their breasts bulging out like that? Seems like everything she does publicly is done with the intention of attracting attention.

She's at that age where celebs think they have to prove they've still "got it," so everything ends up in your face.

And that dress was just plain not flattering. It also accentuated her very short neck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2015, 08:00 AM
 
Location: League City, Texas
2,815 posts, read 4,333,616 times
Reputation: 5801
Quote:
Originally Posted by thegreenflute334 View Post
I think I would trade this one for an iphone5.

http://www.blogcdn.com/slideshows/im...arrivals-1.jpg
Lol--at first glance I thought it was covered in fishing flies!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top