Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-23-2017, 02:21 AM
 
Location: Cannes
2,452 posts, read 2,381,116 times
Reputation: 1620

Advertisements

Yay or nay?


Moderator note: This thread was originally posted in the Automotive forum. It has been moved to Fashion & Beauty.
Attached Thumbnails
New timepiece-whatsapp-image-2017-11-23-07.18.49.jpeg  

Last edited by PJSaturn; 11-23-2017 at 11:11 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-23-2017, 12:32 PM
 
1,095 posts, read 1,056,393 times
Reputation: 2616
Goodness me! Choice of watch is a very personal choice but I would not prefer it since I have old tired eyes. If you like it buy it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2017, 02:27 PM
 
Location: WA
5,641 posts, read 24,953,484 times
Reputation: 6574
I have a cheap digital watch (easier to read) mounted behind a door that covers the radio on my car. Not the most convenient but it does work for me. The watch was about $12 and surprisingly the battery lasts about ten years before replacement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2017, 03:44 PM
 
Location: North Idaho
32,647 posts, read 48,028,221 times
Reputation: 78427
I don't like the way it looks, so you don't have to buy one for me.

Of course, police are getting stickier about cell phones in cars and soon you won't be able to glance at your phone to see what time it is. Fortunately for me, the clock in the radio works in all of our cars, so don't need a watch and don't use the cell phone to check the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2017, 08:33 PM
 
Location: Florida
7,777 posts, read 6,385,415 times
Reputation: 15783
No thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 04:12 AM
 
Location: Cannes
2,452 posts, read 2,381,116 times
Reputation: 1620
Another picture. You guys not a fan of high end watches??
Attached Thumbnails
New timepiece-whatsapp-image-2017-11-24-09.09.23.jpeg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 07:48 AM
 
16,421 posts, read 12,507,028 times
Reputation: 59649
I’m not a fan of watches at all, TBH.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 09:02 AM
 
Location: North Idaho
32,647 posts, read 48,028,221 times
Reputation: 78427
Quote:
Originally Posted by survivingearth View Post
Another picture. You guys not a fan of high end watches??

It looks very steam punk to me.

High end? Sure, I like a plain face gold Phillippe Patek but I never wear a watch.

What appeals to me is extreme functionality, like a deep fathom diver's watch, or else elegant and understated. That watch is neither. But they manufacture it, so it must appeal to enough people to make it worth making it. If you like it, buy one for yourself.

Last edited by oregonwoodsmoke; 11-24-2017 at 09:14 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Kirkland, WA (Metro Seattle)
6,033 posts, read 6,147,063 times
Reputation: 12529
Quote:
Originally Posted by survivingearth View Post
Another picture. You guys not a fan of high end watches??
I know what a Montblanc complication is.

Ditto Rolex and Omega, I own one of each, my only mechanicals.

To do over again, I'd try something one step more-exotic as far as movements go: probably one each Ulysse Nardin and IWC.

If I hit C-level at a major firm, might pickup a Vacheron Constantin and or Jaeger Lecoultre. That's a "money to burn" stage...

Yours is gorgeous, only to fellow nerds however. I'd wear it with pride, knowing you'll impress other watch nerds and few others.

In fact I've taken to wearing a Garmin Fenix 5, collecting tons of telemetry about my day (and about me, heart rate and motion). I figure twenty years from now they'll have a slew of sensors monitoring us: hope so, keeps me honest. I think it's the opposite of sexy. So, styles and desires change over time!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 11:52 AM
 
Location: NYC-LBI-PHL
2,678 posts, read 2,099,392 times
Reputation: 6711
I prefer a Rochefoucauld. The thinnest water-resistant watch in the world. Singularly unique, sculptured in design, hand-crafted in Switzerland, and water resistant to three atmospheres.

Last edited by 5-all; 11-24-2017 at 12:45 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top