U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Fine Arts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-26-2013, 08:38 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
19,379 posts, read 13,050,331 times
Reputation: 14092

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by travric View Post
Very interesting points. Right, I am stunned at how 'popular' a Bacon painting has become. Is the art perhaps an expensive 'taste' of the times which as you noted focuses now on the 'disturbed' and 'unbalanced'? We apparently are at the other end of the spectrum say from the Mona Lisa. Really Bacon's painting all have the 'posions' right up there on the surface. He sets it right up to the viewer's face. heheh what's happening to so-called 'beauty'?' ...;-)...Arguably it now looks like it's lost or perhaps undergoing a transformation.
As the old saw says: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
I'm not a Bacon fan, but then, I have never seen one of his paintings in person.

Reproductions are very seldom accurate to the original. The camera always robs a painting of something, and film always changes the colors. Electronic only reproduction is no better for the same reasons.

There is nothing yet made that is as sensitive as the human eye, and a painting's size is a vital element always. Who knows? If I'm ever to see an original Bacon, I might change my opinion in a split second.

EVen so, there is still plenty of conventionally beautiful art to be found. A painting by Gustav Klimt went for multi-millions last year, and Klimt was extremely controversial in his day, but few would say his paintings are not beautiful. He was popular when he was alive, especially among the wealthy and influential art buyers of his day, and has become even more popular in the 100 years since his death.

Klimt was a true master of the craft as well as being a visionary artist.
There were others in the Austrian Secession art movement in turn-of-the-century Vienna, and many were fine painters and sculptors, but none could match him in the technical mastery of his materials.

Few of his contemporaries would have spent the money on materials that Klimt spent as well. His use of gold leaf was extravagant, as was his use of oil paint. Both were as expensive then as now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Fine Arts
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top