Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Florida
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-02-2007, 01:01 AM
 
2 posts, read 8,764 times
Reputation: 13

Advertisements

Been reading some of the posts about insurance in Florida and they talk about self insuring. What is that? Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-02-2007, 04:29 AM
 
2,313 posts, read 3,191,340 times
Reputation: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by prairigh View Post
Been reading some of the posts about insurance in Florida and they talk about self insuring. What is that? Thanks.
I would think in the truest sense it would mean having a fund to draw from should you have the need. In other words instead of paying $7,000 a year to an insurance company paying it to the account you have set up. If nothing ever happens you have the money and hopefully if something does happens it will cover it. The big problem is, few people would ever actually do this. They would spend the money and find themselves unable to pay for even a small loss or repair if it did occur.

I think most peoples idea of being self insured is "No insurance", not putting the money away in case. I see a difference between say health insurance and home insurance. I would never go without health insurance. The costs could be almost UN-payable if something happened and can go on for years maybe the rest of your life. A house on the other hand, if you come right down to it is not such a big deal. Even a total loss can be easily paid for. Just myself as an example, I have been involved in the building trades and can build a house for a reasonable cost even in today's environment.

But that would be the absolute worst case scenario though. Chances are, nothing will ever happen and if it did would just require some small repairs and you would have plenty of money to do them for a reasonable cost if you know a little something about it. Self insuring is not a bad idea on paper but I am afraid human nature being what it is, most people would fail at systematically putting away the money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2007, 06:11 PM
 
Location: PA
669 posts, read 3,193,340 times
Reputation: 288
I think the person who talked about it was probably nuts. It's better to have real insurance than to take the cop out route and "self insure" which means basically nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2007, 06:18 PM
 
2,313 posts, read 3,191,340 times
Reputation: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmurphy View Post
I think the person who talked about it was probably nuts. It's better to have real insurance than to take the cop out route and "self insure" which means basically nothing.
Can you explain what you mean?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2007, 06:39 PM
 
1,775 posts, read 8,098,338 times
Reputation: 799
But how many people can afford to buy a home and still have enough money to put aside to cover the cost of the home should something happen to it? What if it burned down, a tornado came by and took it out, Maybe some crazy driver drove through the wall which seems to happen more often than not lately. I mean unless you have enough money to cover your home loss at the same time you buy the home i see that as taking a huge risk. That's like not having health insurance. All it takes is one unexpected health condition and your in debt up to your eyeballs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2007, 07:51 PM
 
2,313 posts, read 3,191,340 times
Reputation: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by daniellefort View Post
But how many people can afford to buy a home and still have enough money to put aside to cover the cost of the home should something happen to it? What if it burned down, a tornado came by and took it out, Maybe some crazy driver drove through the wall which seems to happen more often than not lately. I mean unless you have enough money to cover your home loss at the same time you buy the home i see that as taking a huge risk. That's like not having health insurance. All it takes is one unexpected health condition and your in debt up to your eyeballs.
No, with your health the possible loss can be almost unlimited and last a life time. With a house you know exactly the risk you are taking is and it is a decision you are able to accuratly make. I have said this before if you are paying say $5000 on a house worth $200,000 you are paying 5% of the value of the house every year and a total loss pays you 20 to 1 on what you are paying. The real chance of losing your house really may be that of lottery numbers.

The insurance may be over price by like 1000 to 1. If the odds were really 20 to 1 something was going to happen to your house you would never sleep another night worrying about it, why even bother buying a house. This should be so illegal, it is worse odds then anything you will find in any casino in the world. It is thievery of the highest order praying on fear and it is legal..WTF
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2007, 07:54 PM
 
Location: PA
669 posts, read 3,193,340 times
Reputation: 288
Quote:
Originally Posted by macguy View Post
Can you explain what you mean?
I don't feel that self insuring is good enough, basically what daniellefort said: If something big happens you're likely not to have enough money saved. Stashing $100 and calling yourself self-insured (which was the tone of the person who suggested it, NAH, awhile back) is NOT good enough. He was informal enough about it that I figured he'd stow away maybe $100 or $200 or something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2007, 08:05 PM
 
2,313 posts, read 3,191,340 times
Reputation: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmurphy View Post
I don't feel that self insuring is good enough, basically what daniellefort said: If something big happens you're likely not to have enough money saved. Stashing $100 and calling yourself self-insured (which was the tone of the person who suggested it, NAH, awhile back) is NOT good enough. He was informal enough about it that I figured he'd stow away maybe $100 or $200 or something.
It is like everything else, those who can least afford it always pay through the nose. They can't afford to take any chances. That is also why I said most could not do it if they wanted to. They would pi$$ away the money anyway and not have anything to cover the repairs should they need to. It is just a shame to function based on fear, often fears that are unfounded.

I just explained what self insuring is not suggesting people with no money do it. You can put like $50,000 in an account or investment ear marked for repairs and add like $5000 a year and see what happens as is grows. You know what will happen, nothing and you will spend the money some time later on your retirement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2007, 09:47 PM
 
2,313 posts, read 3,191,340 times
Reputation: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by macguy View Post
No, with your health the possible loss can be almost unlimited and last a life time. With a house you know exactly the risk you are taking is and it is a decision you are able to accuratly make. I have said this before if you are paying say $5000 on a house worth $200,000 you are paying 5% of the value of the house every year and a total loss pays you 20 to 1 on what you are paying. The real chance of losing your house really may be that of lottery numbers.

The insurance may be over price by like 1000 to 1. If the odds were really 20 to 1 something was going to happen to your house you would never sleep another night worrying about it, why even bother buying a house. This should be so illegal, it is worse odds then anything you will find in any casino in the world. It is thievery of the highest order praying on fear and it is legal..WTF
I meant to say 2 1/2 % and 40 to 1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2007, 06:27 AM
 
166 posts, read 986,405 times
Reputation: 47
Was anybody around during Hurricane Andrew? I saw the damage it did and it was just more than a few repairs! A whole city needed to be rebuilt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Florida

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top