Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Ford and Lincoln
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-21-2012, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
11,157 posts, read 13,995,357 times
Reputation: 14940

Advertisements

I really like what Ford has done with the Taurus beginning in 2010. It is surprising to me that they chose to resurrect the old namesake on a car that can really stand up on its own.
Now with 2013 comes a slight facelift and some changes in power train options.

Perhaps the most exciting is that in the non-SHO cars will be an available 2.0 Ecoboost 4-cylinder engine that gets 237 hp and 250 ft-lb of torque. While that motor may be a slug in a car that weighs in at 4000 lbs, Ford promises "at least" 31 MPG.

Also the base 3.5 V6 will increase hp from 263 to 290. Not too shabby for someone who is just looking for a nice, conservative but not too expensive 4-door sedan.

Perhaps most disappointing is that Ford has chosen not to alter the SHO power train. The 3.5 V6 remains unchanged at 365 hp and 350 ft-lbs of torque. Not bad, really but I was hoping to see Ford really juice it up.

I like it. I have three kids now and my Mustang's days are numbered. The new Taurus is a car I wouldn't mind driving if I choose to go the 4-door sedan route. I've considered smaller SUVs (4Runner) and pickups (F-150/Tacoma). Ford is making it tough for me to make up my mind!

2013 Ford Taurus and Taurus SHO Bow In The Big Apple

Ford Taurus (2013)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-21-2012, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Poway, CA
2,698 posts, read 12,167,740 times
Reputation: 2251
No stick? No care.......

Mike
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2012, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
11,157 posts, read 13,995,357 times
Reputation: 14940
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteboyslo View Post
No stick? No care.......

Mike
Normally I would agree with you there. But I am getting ready to move to the East Coast and will be driving in some ugly traffic, which can be frustrating in a 5-speed. Before I spend $$$ on a new car though I am going to wait and see how my commute is. If the commute is not too insufferable and if my wife and I can put off replacing my Mustang due to family size, I'll keep it for a few more years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2012, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,829 posts, read 25,102,289 times
Reputation: 19060
The Taurus isnt really a driver's car. It doesn't bother me that much that there is no manual.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2012, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
6,476 posts, read 7,320,658 times
Reputation: 7026
I have an '05 (<40K miles.) It's got nice pick up and it's a comfortable ride (I have a V6 with DOHC) but at 12.3 mpg she's a little thirsty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2012, 12:51 PM
 
170 posts, read 634,579 times
Reputation: 78
They made some improvements but i prefer the 2010 grill over the 2013
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2012, 01:04 PM
 
2,182 posts, read 5,435,954 times
Reputation: 1214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cavaturaccioli View Post
I have an '05 (<40K miles.) It's got nice pick up and it's a comfortable ride (I have a V6 with DOHC) but at 12.3 mpg she's a little thirsty.
that can't be right, I think you must have someting wrong with your car if you're getting 12mpg out of it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2012, 03:18 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
3,135 posts, read 11,885,624 times
Reputation: 2494
I think I'd stick to the new redesigned Fusion, much better looking car.

The taurus just looks odd. It's too big or something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2012, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Central Jersey - Florida
3,377 posts, read 14,622,864 times
Reputation: 2272
Quote:
Originally Posted by kazyn View Post
that can't be right, I think you must have someting wrong with your car if you're getting 12mpg out of it
I agree. If they are getting 12 mpg they either have a problem or a lead foot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2012, 03:38 PM
 
Location: United State of Texas
1,707 posts, read 6,209,015 times
Reputation: 2135
It will do well in the rental and fleet car world. It is a much improved car from the old Taurus (I had several as company cars).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Ford and Lincoln
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top