Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Ford and Lincoln
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2012, 07:40 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
5,994 posts, read 20,069,075 times
Reputation: 4078

Advertisements

Hey guys, so two or three times a year I come down to see my family in Minden, NV and my uncle has a couple of older trucks hanging around the property. His project truck is a 1988 Ford F250 with the 5.8L V8 and an automatic transmission. I was telling him about the cat deletes I have on my Genesis Coupe (I had a guy pull up to me the other day and he was thoroughly amused by the flames I'm shooting out from the dual exhaust under WOT) and he mentioned that on his truck the cat's aren't as simple as replacing a single pipe as there are two pipes going into a flange for the cats. He lives in a county that doesn't require smog testing so he's looking to delete his cats as well. I haven't had a chance to look under the truck yet to see what he's talking about but I figured we had a few guys on the forums who knew a bit about these trucks. Along with the cat deletes what else would you guys recommend to get some more power out of it? It's a carb'd engine which I've never worked on. I'm used to tuning modern fuel injected cars with ECU programming and a laptop hookup so looking at a carb is very alien to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2012, 07:58 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
5,994 posts, read 20,069,075 times
Reputation: 4078
As a second question, my uncle also would like to install a winch onto the front of the truck and he was telling me that the factory bumper is far too thin to support a winch. From my quick research on the Ford truck forums it looks like a lot of guys modify their bumpers or have some sort of winch mount installed. Anyone know of a good way to do this? This winch will be put to work and needs to support a heavy load (will be pulling cords of wood).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Earth
4,237 posts, read 24,771,717 times
Reputation: 2274
Hhhmm...I was almost certain by 1988 all Ford trucks with the V8's were EFI. No..?

Depending no what kind of carb is on the engine. I know how to tune a Holley. It's a matter of changing jets inside the bowl to give you the amount of fuel needed into the ventruis of the cab. Also the power valve gets changed (if req'd) to meet the vacuum of the engine.

You can obtain more power by going with a better exhaust system....like long tube headers, bigger exhaust pipe (don't go too big - a dual 2.5 inch or a single 3 inch should be all you need), a good flowing muffler (not a Flowmaster - they're really only good for making the exhaust sound good), advancing the timing a little.

If you want to get more in depth, a camshaft swap can help. So can a slightly higher stall speed torque converter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 02:29 PM
 
4,236 posts, read 8,136,274 times
Reputation: 10208
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTsLiKeAnEgG View Post
I was telling him about the cat deletes I have on my Genesis Coupe (I had a guy pull up to me the other day and he was thoroughly amused by the flames I'm shooting out from the dual exhaust under WOT)

I have a hard time believing your little Hyundai with a cat delete shoots flames out of the exhaust under WOT, considering a Porsche 911 turbo in race trim will only throw flames under decel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Nebraska
4,530 posts, read 8,861,262 times
Reputation: 7597
Flames at WOT? Deceleration and raw fuel yes but under load all of the fuel should be burned UNLESS it is running super rich.
GL2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 03:49 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,816,250 times
Reputation: 18304
I know guys who setup spark plugs at rear of exhaust and fllod engine before starting to bet flames out rear. never seen this with a long exhaust .muct be very rich indeed and very hot exhaust.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,717 posts, read 18,909,338 times
Reputation: 11225
Your uncle has an early production 1988 F250 if it's a carbed engine. The carb is a Holley. Because it is a Kalifornia truck, I would assume it came as a CARB Compliant truck which means it has the Kalifornia emissions on it. The header pipe will terminate right at the cat from each side and it should have only one cat. This might be what he's referring to. He can drop the entire exhaust system and start at the exhaust headers and go to the back with true duals if he just wants the noise. If he's expecting any performance gains, unless the current system is clogged he'll probably not only not see any any gains but it's highly likely he'll see low end torque drop. Dumping duals on most vehicles and expecting gains is just dumb. The issue is with exhaust temps. With any dual exhaust system the flow rate to the exit point is much slower than a single. As such the temperature of the gas cools and becomes heavy. The engine is now having to push the heavy gases out which means it runs much higher paschal weight inside the pipe over that of a single unit. By 1988 the exhausts were not restrictive like a 1950's engine so gains are slim to none. Now if he goes with larger carburation, cam, bigger valves, then he probably would need to update the exhaust. But on a stock or close to stock engine, all yer doing is making noise. The 5.8 was always the dog in it's class. If he wants a screamer in a 3/4 ton truck, he needs to find a 385 block out of an old Mercury and start building it. I ran one in my squirt boat making 2800HP that turned 10,000 RPMs. They can be made to run and there's no lack of power even with a stock engine. The 385's even make the FEs look weak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 06:08 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
5,994 posts, read 20,069,075 times
Reputation: 4078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fargobound View Post
I have a hard time believing your little Hyundai with a cat delete shoots flames out of the exhaust under WOT, considering a Porsche 911 turbo in race trim will only throw flames under decel.
I'm running upsized injectors, full boltons, reflashed ECU and the flames are certainly there. I didn't actually know this until a few days ago when a stranger who pulled up next to me told me how cool he thought it was. I don't have any intention to shoot flames but its good to know its there so I can watch myself around law enforcement. To clarify, of course the flames aren't shooting out while I'm on the throttle. It's every time I do a WOT (or even 70%+ throttle) run anywhere near redline and then release the throttle to shift gears (or slow down altogether).

This isn't my car but you can see for yourself:
http://youtu.be/jnqxwUlC87U

BTW, I don't care how "little" you think the car is but a stock turbo car runs a 13.3 quarter mile with bolt ons and pulls .95g's on the skidpad. I'd say those are some praise worthy numbers. Things get really interesting once the turbo is replaced and the suspension is modified.

Last edited by iTsLiKeAnEgG; 02-18-2012 at 06:24 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 06:20 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
5,994 posts, read 20,069,075 times
Reputation: 4078
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperL View Post
Your uncle has an early production 1988 F250 if it's a carbed engine. The carb is a Holley. Because it is a Kalifornia truck, I would assume it came as a CARB Compliant truck which means it has the Kalifornia emissions on it. The header pipe will terminate right at the cat from each side and it should have only one cat. This might be what he's referring to. He can drop the entire exhaust system and start at the exhaust headers and go to the back with true duals if he just wants the noise. If he's expecting any performance gains, unless the current system is clogged he'll probably not only not see any any gains but it's highly likely he'll see low end torque drop. Dumping duals on most vehicles and expecting gains is just dumb. The issue is with exhaust temps. With any dual exhaust system the flow rate to the exit point is much slower than a single. As such the temperature of the gas cools and becomes heavy. The engine is now having to push the heavy gases out which means it runs much higher paschal weight inside the pipe over that of a single unit. By 1988 the exhausts were not restrictive like a 1950's engine so gains are slim to none. Now if he goes with larger carburation, cam, bigger valves, then he probably would need to update the exhaust. But on a stock or close to stock engine, all yer doing is making noise. The 5.8 was always the dog in it's class. If he wants a screamer in a 3/4 ton truck, he needs to find a 385 block out of an old Mercury and start building it. I ran one in my squirt boat making 2800HP that turned 10,000 RPMs. They can be made to run and there's no lack of power even with a stock engine. The 385's even make the FEs look weak.
Noise alone is definitely not what he's after so if noticeable gains aren't expected then we might just leave the exhaust as is. My uncle lives in Minden, Nevada so I'm not sure if it was originally a California truck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 12:29 AM
 
Location: Poway, CA
2,698 posts, read 12,167,740 times
Reputation: 2251
Ford Truck Enthusiasts, 1948-2011 Ford F150, Super Duty & SUV owners community and information source. Covers F100, F-150, F250, Bronco, Ranger, Explorer, Expedition, Lighting, Escape and More is an excellent resource for model-specific questions like this on the Ford pick-ups.

And are you sure it has a carb? By 88, I'm pretty sure the 351 was FI.

Mike
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Ford and Lincoln

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top