Quote:
Originally Posted by compelled to reply
It's not capitalism, it's the type of capitalism. We are still talking about government-manipulated capitalism after all, we aren't talking about a truly free market and a responsible American public. Think about how the gov't didn't let Bear Stearns fail a week ago. The government should stay out of their business so our economy could more quickly return to it's natural state, since our economy is based on irresponsible debt and out of balance for that reason. Watch as these kind of cases start to pile up over the next 6 months. We are going to crash and burn instead of having a soft landing because of government intervention in cases like last week. You also can't forget about our "stimulus check", the pseudo-fascist government handing out money that they don't actually have and telling us to "go shopping" instead of paying off our ridiculous debt, which wouldn't work anyway because like I said, they don't really have that money. Pay off debt with debt.
Honestly though, what's a better way to go? I would like to hear your ideas. I'm not a flat out Libertarian but I think the government should be responsible for infrastructure and nothing else, and that is not what our government is functioning as right now, so as a result our infrastructure AND economy are failing.
Back on topic, Hallandale buying the foreclosed homes sounds great in the meanwhile, because Broward County is ridiculously overpriced and overvalued, even the foreclosures, but in the long term, how is city government buying houses for the poor to live going to help the middle class? That's just going to keep the prices from falling more than they should naturally. The best part is that this is at the expensive of the middle class taxpayer living in their overpriced 2 bedroom condo conversion who could just as easily back their bags for North Carolina. Talk about encouraging middle class exodus!
|
No disrespect but my first degree is in Economics. I finished my first degree back in 2000, did my thesis paper on the then telecom and tech bubble. I say that to say, I have studied this subject for some time (back to 1996). The problem we are in now goes much further back than the buy out of some investment bank. The markets were given free reign (laissez faire) which is what lead to all these exotic loans and shadow banking etc. You can NOT allow the market to do anything it wants. People are greedy, plain and simple and as such will not do what is in the best interest of the country. They will do what is in their own best interest and as such they should be watched and curtailed. NYTs put up a great article on this very subject today, its six pages but if you have the time you should check it out. I should mention that the business cycle where there are boom times and recessions are natural cycles in a capitalistic society. Nothing is wrong with that at all, but they should not be coming to us every 7 years or less as has been the case recently. There was a bubble in the financial markets in the 90s, that went up in flames and then there was the tech and telecom bubble in 2001 and now this housing, financial bubble. These are all speculative bubbles where faux wealth is created for a number of reasons. Again this is all part of capitalism and all were allowed to happen out of a lack of proper regulation/over sight.
As for what a government should do? No, they should not just be involved in infrastructure. As said before, people left up to their own devices will do what is in their own best interest regardless of how that affects the over all society. People should be allowed to do business yes, but with in limits. lets say govt didn't get involved at all with anything but infrastructure. Heck, you could be sold cold medicine with non tested drugs that could cause cancer or known to cause cancer. But with this limited govt your talking about, there would be no one to stop them until citizens catch on and stop purchasing the product. By that time you will have a number of deaths or people becoming ill. If we did a hands off govt. people would be free to scam people in contracts and steal their money. That is just a all around bad idea to say the least. Govt is there to protect and provide for its citizens. That is why we pay taxes, for these protections.
As for the housing issue, buy up the homes and turn them around and give them to people able to make monthly payments. That is what I say, the alternatives could be where communities are allowed to become squatter villages, vagrants moving in and all other sorts of undesirable situations coming about.
This is a very complicated situation. One we have not seen the likes of ever. A lot of these things have happened before but not compounded nationally at one momentous time. This next few years will be extremely interesting, just hope everyone is prepared.