Quote:
Originally Posted by fauve
You just proved my point. The only leverage that realtors have had is a monopoly on the listings for both buyers and sellers until fairly recently. Flat fee agents takes some of the sting out of prices for the sellers, should they choose to go on their own. Thanks to Realtor.com, buyers can browse through properties on their own and can contact selling agents directly, who often have an arrangement for lower fees (in the 4% range) when they bring the buyer. In a flat fee case buyers who contact a seller directly often get an immediate 6% discount off the top.
Ya gotta love the internet. Realtors and travel agents are dying breeds. Sorry.
|
I agree, as a buyer I would contact the sellers agent. Because we all know the sellers agent will do the right thing by the BUYER.

Actually, I love when they have no agent I dont have to pay 3% out to them. I charge a discounted 4-5% and make more money!
The flat fee case is not so popular, reason being nobody wants to pay for print ads. If it just gets dumped in MLS, the flat fee company(a Realtor by the way) still get paid for doing nothing. (What thats not mold...lead paint? Noooo, its all set.)
Just what I want is a seller telling me about his house, and me spending the most money in my entire life with no professional help. Great idea.
Should there be higher standards of education for real estate agent, yes. Should there be less agents overall,yes.
Will you always need an agent,yes.
FSBO's are 2% of the sales in my state. I did 3.9 million in sales in 08, my company did 80mill plus. Thats in the worse year ever in real estate, I'm not worried.
Funny, the real estate market has a slowdown, the country falls apart. Real estate an important part of the economy? Ya Think?