U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Easter!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Frugal Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-13-2017, 11:36 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
20,792 posts, read 37,451,783 times
Reputation: 20799

Advertisements

It would be really bad if the sole earner was frugal, and the stay-at-home spouse was a spender.


If Both have a frugal bent. There will be Fewer financial issues and good alignment on what is spent.

Nothing is easy. Good to have some mitigating / flexible funds available to each when needed.

Good if neither is an OCD watchdog on finances. Often you don't think of the best ideas, or the drastic consequences thinking and spending on your own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-14-2017, 08:43 AM
 
2,062 posts, read 1,325,490 times
Reputation: 2612
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabrrita View Post
Why do you assume that the spenders will have issues and the frugal ones will not? I know many frugal couples that split because one is frugal, well balance in their spending and savings while the other person is a cheapo who would go all stupid and wacko over spending $20 for their anniversary sit down dinner at Denny's.

Frugal couples don't have a monopoly on getting along because of their blissful frugal spending; they equally can have issues arise and be as unhappy as regular folks.
No no, I said if the spender couple out spend their income only then will they stress out & fight. If their spending is with in their limit then they are equally happy, if not more happy, than couple 1- frugal couple

The couple you explained are not frugal, they dont see eye to ey.. They are part of couple #3.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2017, 03:21 PM
 
Location: Portal to the Pacific
4,678 posts, read 4,582,667 times
Reputation: 5354
I think so. It takes a lot of commitment to be frugal. It takes a lot of commitment to be in marriage. Putting the two together seems easy to us and just makes us stronger as a couple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
69,278 posts, read 79,447,244 times
Reputation: 38641
more than how much a couple makes, the important thing, which many have said, is they agree how to sped it or save it, whatever. I think a little difference is perfectly acceptable, but when one is a spend thrift and the other he opposite, it is trouble ahead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Boise, ID
8,011 posts, read 22,505,069 times
Reputation: 9213
From my sample size of 1, that is true. My husband and I are frugal, and it does take a lot of the stress out of everything.

I find that if we don't have to worry about money, much of the rest of the stress goes away. Most of our stress is actually from mandatory overtime that each of us have faced from time to time. Too many hours, not enough sleep, and not enough time together. We don't need the money from more hours, but the jobs don't give the option to NOT work the overtime. First world problems, I guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 04:44 PM
 
7,356 posts, read 4,427,372 times
Reputation: 8306
Quote:
Originally Posted by 49erfan916 View Post
This may be a bit controversial and this is totally opinion based. But based from what I've seen personally, the couples I know who make adequate amount of money SEEM like they have stronger relationships rather than if one or both people make a HUGE salary but never see each other. But I want to know what you guys think
So which of these couples is the frugal couple? Being frugal (or not) is not a function of income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Frugal Living
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top