U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Genealogy
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-08-2012, 04:23 AM
 
Location: Colorado (PA at heart)
8,240 posts, read 12,854,359 times
Reputation: 10464

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nightbird47 View Post
I took the ages of death of all the found ancestors and listed them once. It was interesting that a good many lived very long lives, even some of the women despite a lot of children. My great 5x greandfather lived til 91 in the 1800's. Then there is a drop off. Most of those who didn't live to what we consider modern 'norms' died by their fifties, many women before. It seems like you were built to fight off the disease and were generally in better health and lived longer or you didn't/weren't and died much earlier. Not much inbetween.

Remove the medical stuff around today and I wonder how the curve would run.
Oh yes, people go on about how the life expectancy was so much lower in history. But they forget that this number is drastically pulled down by infant and children deaths. If you survived childhood, you had a pretty good chance of living into your 70's or later.

I have one person in my tree who, legend has it, lived to be 120. I think that's probably exaggerated! But even lower estimates by professional historians and genealogists have put him no younger than 110 when he died in 1832. Certainly the oldest person in my tree!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-08-2012, 08:44 AM
Status: "Even better than okay" (set 20 days ago)
 
Location: Coastal New Jersey
51,485 posts, read 50,728,421 times
Reputation: 60484
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallysmom View Post
I have no proof, but I do believe it's a very real possibility my great grandmother died giving birth to my granduncle. And my sister very nearly died after the birth of my niece... in 1994. In a hospital.

So yeah -- I wouldn't like to give birth at home -- give me a hospital where I stand a chance of making it if something goes WAY wrong.
My sister recently found someone in the family tree...two women with the same name, one born in 1906, one died in 1906, a few days apart. She realized it was a mother and daughter--mother must have died within a couple of days of giving birth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Genealogy
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top