Why don't genetic test come back with a certain % of primate?
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, since humans are primates, all humans have 100% primate DNA. All of our DNA would be primate DNA.
I assume you want to see what percentage of common genetic material in a human's DNA compared to a the dna of one of today's primates. Percentage of common genetic material is probably not the best way to do this, since genetic structure is just as imprtant as composition of the genome, but it is an interesting point.
My understanding is that the most extensive research into this was a study published in the January 4, 2002 edition of the journal Science, entitled "Construction and analysis of a human-chimpanzee comparative clone map." It was a small study, but of the portions of the genome it reviewed, there were over 98% common results and under 2% differences, but those differences were incredible and really show the diversity that small changes to the genome can do. Entirely difference species are extremely similar, yet so very different. While its probably boring to many, you can find the article at any library for free and online in various pay and free research sites. I would love to see something done using the advances in genome mapping made in the 14 years since this was published. Maybe someone will fund some research. But to answer your question, any basic genetic test does show that you and a chimpanzee are remarkably similar on a genetic level, but those small differences (like the extra chromosome pair for the chimp, the huge y chromosome for the chimp, the massive changes in the 12th chromosome pairing between the two and many others) are what make humans so human. Now whether you believe a deity designed it this way or its the result of evolution, I leave to your own thoughts. But its clear we humans and chimps have mostly common dna.
Whole genome comparisons have now been done that confirm the 2% difference.
Since most scientist believe in evolution why don't genetic test say you have a certain percentage of primate in your DNA? Such .000000000009% Primate?
Since most scientist believe in evolution why don't genetic test say you have a certain percentage of primate in your DNA? Such .000000000009% Primate?
There's no point. Everyone's percentage is the same: 100.
Since most scientist believe in evolution why don't genetic test say you have a certain percentage of primate in your DNA? Such .000000000009% Primate?
An individual either belongs to a biological clade (such as primates) or it doesn't. There is no fractional membership. So, humans are 100% primates. So are chimpanzees, gorillas, and all the other great apes, as well as in monkeys (all of them, as should be obvious) and the other primates, such as lemurs are lorises. Meanwhile, all non-primates (ie, everything that isn't a primate, from cats to birds to fish to insects to trees) is 0% primate.
Now, primates share a lot of DNA with non-primates, which rather clarifies the fact that genes are not either primate or non-primate. Individual specimens, such as you or I or Koko the gorilla? Yes. Genes? No.
Essentially, your question doesn't even make sense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.