U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-21-2009, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Cincinnati(Silverton)
1,584 posts, read 2,385,387 times
Reputation: 656

Advertisements

When did Vegas get a million people?

 
Old 05-21-2009, 11:48 PM
rah
 
Location: Oakland
3,315 posts, read 8,128,162 times
Reputation: 2508
Quote:
Originally Posted by unusualfire View Post
When did Vegas get a million people?
Vegas's Police Department covers a population of 1,000,000. Vegas city limits has a smaller population though. Same kind of deal for Louisville and Charlotte.
 
Old 08-19-2009, 12:39 PM
 
167 posts, read 381,400 times
Reputation: 59
I wouldnt call LA overcrowded just because of how big the city is, if you compare LA's population to its land it really isnt that bad
 
Old 08-19-2009, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Washington, DC
402 posts, read 760,884 times
Reputation: 231
Default worst

why the hell is everyone obsessed with finding "the worst" of everything? we get it, where we live sucks, where you live is heaven, but it gets a little old.
 
Old 08-24-2009, 04:56 AM
 
3,703 posts, read 4,275,809 times
Reputation: 2234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
A little OT trivia here, but actually the largest city in America, geographically, is Sitka AK; population 9,000, land area 2,900 square miles. That is not a typo: this city of 9,000 has nearly twenty times the land area as L.A. Population density: three people per square mile. Gotta wonder: what's the point?
Because it is either rural or a small town that has a lot of countryside under its political control. It has nothing to do with it being an actual urban entity like New York or Chicago.

A lot of little farming communities with populations less than a thousand have a larger area than cities like Cleveland or Buffalo.
 
Old 08-24-2009, 12:25 PM
 
45 posts, read 37,229 times
Reputation: 25
Cleveland without a doubt.


Forbes Magazine came out with its list of "America's Fastest Dying Cities". Out of 10 locations, Ohio has four cities on the list: Cleveland, Youngstown, Dayton and Canton.


High unemployment, a fleeing population and lack of economic growth make up the measuring tools Forbes used to compile the list.
Behind Ohio, Michigan is second with two cities on the list: Flint and Detroit. Flints unemployment is now close to 10 percent.


Much of Cleveland looks like a war zone.
 
Old 10-07-2009, 06:40 PM
 
2 posts, read 2,926 times
Reputation: 10
Indianapolis Near north east side is one of the worst areas in the midwest. Murder, prostitution, drugs, gangs, you name it. It has been slowly getting worse for the past three decades now. How do we get it back on track? Easy, put so many police and church organizations there for extended time such as three months and simply flood the gates with positive actions. Lock up every single dirtbag drug dealer, killer, gang banger and take back our damn youth. Everyone has excuses but no action. Non stop, three months, 24-7. Constatant police, community organizers, rallies, 3-4 in the morning! Flood the palce non- stop!!!! Bright lights, video cameras, news crews! Clean up the mess and you will see a better north east side in one year.
 
Old 10-07-2009, 06:43 PM
 
2 posts, read 2,926 times
Reputation: 10
NEWS CREWS AND BRIGHT LIGHTS AND POLICE AND CHOIRS AND COMMUNITY AND CHURCHES AND 3 MONTHS OF SOLID NO MESSING AROUND!= Change !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Old 10-08-2009, 09:58 AM
 
Location: 30-40N 90-100W
13,856 posts, read 22,988,108 times
Reputation: 6688
Quote:
Originally Posted by nva79 View Post
why the hell is everyone obsessed with finding "the worst" of everything? we get it, where we live sucks, where you live is heaven, but it gets a little old.
Where I live sucks. Well actually if you looked at it's a pretty little town with mostly middle or upper-class people. I just don't care for it and have had bad experiences here. Also way too many of the people are drunks or in service to this one mafia-like family.

I don't know if where you live is therefore heaven. My guess would be most places are a mix of sucky and heavenly ranging from "almost totally sucky" to "almost totally heavenly." I believe a study showed that even in Gary, Indiana like 12% of people were happy to be there. (I'm disincluding towns that are literally toxic waste-dumps that are going to be abandoned)
 
Old 01-07-2010, 07:23 PM
 
3 posts, read 9,491 times
Reputation: 11
The worst big city is probably Detroit or maybe New Orleans if that counts (city pop is 300 000, metro is 1.1 million). Chicago and L.A. are WAY better than those two in terms of the job market and crime.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top