U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: The ten most sprawling U.S. cities
Atlanta 194 54.96%
Dallas 142 40.23%
Houston 178 50.42%
Oklahoma City 58 16.43%
Charlotte, NC 71 20.11%
Jacksonville, FL 75 21.25%
Tampa, FL 29 8.22%
Los Angeles 166 47.03%
San Diego 43 12.18%
San Jose, CA 47 13.31%
Sacramento, CA 32 9.07%
Indianapolis 35 9.92%
Columbus, OH 26 7.37%
Nashville, TN 35 9.92%
Memphis, TN 17 4.82%
Lexington, KY 8 2.27%
Phoenix 176 49.86%
Tucson 37 10.48%
Las Vegas 108 30.59%
other (please specify) 42 11.90%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 353. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-19-2012, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Carrboro and Concord, NC
964 posts, read 2,050,669 times
Reputation: 1230

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bryson662001 View Post
How did so many people get so confused about urban sprawl? Los Angeles is one of the densest cities in the US. It is the opposite of sprawl. Neither Houston nor Dallas sprawl. In both those cities development goes from the center out to the edge and then stops. Same story with Las Vegas and Phoenix. The cities that sprawl are Boston, NY, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington DC, Atlanta, St Louis, Detroit and to a lesser extent Chicago. Sprawl means that development leapfrogs itself and extends out into the countryside with undeveloped patches in between.
The first cities that sprang to mind are consolidated city/counties: Jacksonville, Augusta, Nashville, along with cities like OKC and KC which - during the 1960s annexed hundreds of square miles, in anticipation of development that never happened. With some of these, you're talking about cities that encompass 600-800 square miles, much of which is undeveloped rural land, but also speckled with long-distance suburbs surrounded by countryside.

Suffolk and Chesapeake, VA would also fit the description in the above paragraph. They are both "independent cities" (like Baltimore, Carson City and St Louis, along with all "cities" (not towns) in Virginia. suffolk was created when the town of Nansemond merged with Nasemond County (which no longer exists), and the newly consolidated county then merged with the city of Suffolk, which was the center of population. at 700+ square miles, Suffolk is starting to become speckled with widely scattered exurb-development, though at least 80% of the city of Suffolk remains rural.

Likewise next door in Chesapeake, which was created ~1970 via a merger between the city of South Norfolk and the remainder of Norfolk County. as is as the case with Suffolk, both cities were then declared independent cities, and the "counties" became extinct. And in both of those cities, far less than half of their land area is urban. There a fair bit of suburban cookie-cutter stuff, especially in Chesapeake. But the majority of both is rural land, speckled with small, exurb commuter neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-20-2012, 01:54 PM
 
Location: Phoenix Arizona
2,032 posts, read 4,045,301 times
Reputation: 2699
Wow, we're gonna have to sprawl harder if we're gonna beat Atlanta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 01:59 PM
 
Location: The City
22,345 posts, read 32,231,632 times
Reputation: 7749
Among large cities Atlanta has the lowest percentage of MSA population living within its UA; think Houston is second. Though this is also imperfect but somewhat interesting. Miami on the other hand has 100% of the MSA population contained within the US; only large citiy in the US to have this.

Phoenix is also very high on the UA to MSA ratio
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2012, 04:42 AM
 
2,402 posts, read 3,585,447 times
Reputation: 1266
No New York City metro or Chicago land on the list? Huge sprawlers.

I'd say it goes like this, in terms of urbanized/suburban built-up area, in terms of shear area covered:

1) New York City
2) Los Angeles
3) Chicago
4) Atlanta
5) Dallas-Fort Worth
6) Philadelphia
7) Houston
8) Detroit
9) Phoenix
10) Washington D.C.

Next: San Francisco Bay, Seattle, Boston, Minneapolis-St.Paul, Miami
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top