Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2010, 03:54 AM
 
Location: Tower of Heaven
4,023 posts, read 7,339,886 times
Reputation: 1450

Advertisements

White:
1-California : $1,124 billion
2-Texas : $737 billion
3-New York : $654 billion
4-Illinois : $402 billion
5-Pennsylvania : $394 billion

Black:
1-New York : $88 billion
2-Texas : $72 billion
3-Florida : $63 billion
4-Georgia : $62 billion
5-California : $61 billion

Asian
1-California : $163 billion
2-New York :$ 51 billion
3-Texas : $33 billion
4-New Jersey : $31 billion
5-Illinois : $22 billion

Hispanic
1-California : 249 billion
2-Texas : 171 billion
3-Florida : 101 billion
4-New York : 75 billion
5-Illinois : 40 billion

By the Selig Center for Economic Growth
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2010, 05:23 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,049 posts, read 34,470,644 times
Reputation: 10609
And so...?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2010, 06:37 PM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,221 posts, read 12,262,791 times
Reputation: 3554
Is there a point to this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2010, 01:33 AM
 
Location: Tampa - St. Louis
1,270 posts, read 2,165,140 times
Reputation: 2130
Pretty much correlates to the largest states for each race.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2010, 03:57 AM
 
Location: 30-40°N 90-100°W
13,809 posts, read 26,449,485 times
Reputation: 6783
It might be more interesting if this was per-capita income rather than gross. Still I find statistics fun in a way so what the heck.

If I read it right New York's black population has a GDP slightly above Croatia and significantly above Kenya. Croatia has around 4.4 million people while New York state's black population is under 3.5 million if I'm reading the stats right. Although "buying power" might not be the same as GDP.

As an economic unit California's Asian population would be about 50% larger than that of New Zealand. New Zealand's population looks to be slightly smaller than California's Asian population though.

As an economic unit California's white population would be larger than Indonesia and almost the size of Canada.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat.../2001rank.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2010, 09:09 AM
 
4,795 posts, read 12,323,426 times
Reputation: 8396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas R. View Post
It might be more interesting if this was per-capita income rather than gross. Still I find statistics fun in a way so what the heck.

If I read it right New York's black population has a GDP slightly above Croatia and significantly above Kenya. Croatia has around 4.4 million people while New York state's black population is under 3.5 million if I'm reading the stats right. Although "buying power" might not be the same as GDP.

As an economic unit California's Asian population would be about 50% larger than that of New Zealand. New Zealand's population looks to be slightly smaller than California's Asian population though.

As an economic unit California's white population would be larger than Indonesia and almost the size of Canada.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat.../2001rank.html
I'd like to see a comparison of US black per capita income levels to different European countries per capita income. My Google skills aren't that good I guess. Haven't seen this anywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2010, 10:13 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,500 posts, read 33,311,608 times
Reputation: 12109
Where did you get these stats? These are actually very interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2010, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,037,981 times
Reputation: 7427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
Where did you get these stats? These are actually very interesting.
Buying Power | Selig Center for Economic Growth | Terry College of Business | University of Georgia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2010, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Northridge, Los Angeles, CA
2,684 posts, read 7,351,456 times
Reputation: 2409
There's a few problems with the data;

1) Hispanics aren't separated out in the initial statistics. Some of the Hispanic buying power was added in with the Whites, Blacks, Asian, Multiracial, etc. and is only calculated in terms of "Hispanic" and "Non-Hispanic" Then again, this is a US census problem in general
2) If you guys read the report, here's how they got these statistics to begin with:

http://www.terry.uga.edu/selig/docs/buying_power_2008.pdf(Page (broken link) 11)

Quote:
In general, the estimation process has two parts: estimating disposable personal income and allocating that estimate by race or ethnicity based on both population estimates and variances in per capita income
Basically, they took the proportion of the state's population that is of a certain group and multiplied it by per capita income of each group. The problem with this is that the Bureau of Economic Analysis doesn't keep very good record in what the per capita income of each racial group is. In other words, a lot of this is plain out guesswork.

However, what would be MORE interesting is to see how much each of these groups make up the total buying power of the state. Interestingly enough, unlike most other Western countries, Americans generally have more disposable income to spend in the economy. What this means is that the collective consumer buying power of a state and even the US is around 70-80% of the total money of the United States. I'm sure this has changed with the economy being in the condition that it is, but it looks like American Exceptionalism at its finest.

Anyways, here's what the proportional outlook looks like:

United States (2008) (Page 14)
Total Population: 304,707,703
White (w/ Hispanic): 79.7%
Hispanic: 15.3%
Black: 12.9%
Asian: 4.8%

Market size: $10,721,000,000,000

White (w/ Hispanic): 85.2%
Hispanic: 8.9%
Black: 8.5%
Asian: 4.7%
American Indian: 0.6%
Multiracial: 0.9%

As you can see, Whites clearly are overrepresented in terms of how much disposable income they have in the US as a whole by 6%. Asians as a whole are proportionate to their share of population (but are still SLIGHTLY underrepresented by 2.9%), while Blacks are 35.2% underrepresented in buying power and Hispanics are 41.9% underrepresented in their buying power! I'm sure if White Non-Hispanics had their own statistics, their difference would be even higher.

(Page 29) *Bold (% of total state share/% of state population as of 2008 American community survey)

White (w/ Hispanic):
1-California : $1,124 billion (81.7%/ 60.9%)
2-Texas : $737 billion (86.5%/71.4%)
3-New York : $654 billion (81.5%/66.7%)
4-Illinois : $402 billion (85.1%/71.4%)
5-Pennsylvania : $394 billion (89.5%/83.8%)

Black:
1-New York : $88 billion (10.9%/15.6%)
2-Texas : $72 billion (8.4%/11.5%)
3-Florida : $63 billion (9.6%/15.3%)
4-Georgia : $62 billion (21.1%/29.7%)
5-California : $61 billion (4.5%/6.2%)

Asian
1-California : $163 billion (11.8%/12.3%)
2-New York :$ 51 billion (6.4%/6.9%)
3-Texas : $33 billion (3.8%/3.4%)
4-New Jersey : $31 billion (8.3%/7.5%)
5-Illinois : $22 billion (4.7%/4.3%)

Hispanic
1-California : 249 billion (18.1%/36.1%)
2-Texas : 171 billion (20.9%/35.9%)
3-Florida : 101 billion (15.4%/20.5%)
4-New York : 75 billion (9.4%/16.4%)
5-Illinois : 40 billion (8.7%/14.9%)

The only minority groups that are overrepreseented in their buying power than in their share of the total population are Asians in Texas, New Jersey, and Illinois (and even so, not by much).

However, this statistic is also telling:

Percentage change of buying power from 1990-2008 by group
(Page 25)
United States: 151.0%
Hispanic: 348.9%
Asian: 337.1%
Black: 187.0%
White: 139.4%

Hispanics and Asians, reflecting both groups primarily immigrant character, are increasing their income at more than 2x the rate of the total population. For Hispanics, being the poorest group of the whole, this means that a whole lot of them are entering the middle class (which is a good thing ). For Asians, this means that more and more of them (and me, I guess) are becoming a primarily upper-middle class group.

We'll see how this recession affects that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2010, 03:52 PM
 
Location: STL
1,124 posts, read 3,580,544 times
Reputation: 581
What is buying power?

And why is it seperated by race?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top