Where would you live if pricing and jobs weren't a factor? (apartment, rent)

[jessemh431]

Choose a few places you would live in if the cost of living and job availability was the same in all.

[milquetoast]

Hollywood Hills

[jessemh431]

Originally Posted by milquetoast

Hollywood Hills

Yea baby

[j33]

New York. But it it far too expensive to be worth it, if I could have my apartment for my rent then I'd move in a second, but hell would freeze over before that would happen, so forgettaboutit.

[milquetoast]

Originally Posted by jessemh431

Yea baby

Yeah, I should end my post with

[Ben Around]

Other: San Francisco

[CTownNative]

I would live back in my hometown Cleveland.

[SpeedyAZ]

Hmmm.... Well I'd have to say the 5 following cities:

1) San Francisco (other)
2) Honolulu
3) Malibu (other)
4) Phoenix (other)
5) Palm Beach (other)

[jessemh431]

Originally Posted by SpeedyAZ

Hmmm.... Well I'd have to say the 5 following cities:

1) San Francisco (other)
2) Honolulu
3) Malibu (other)
4) Phoenix (other)
5) Palm Beach (other)

Well Malibu is considered LA and i dont know much about FL but isn't Palm Beach near Miami

[compelled to reply]

I could never live in Palm Beach. You have to leave the island once in a while, and the city across the river in West Palm Beach has so much depressing poverty that I just couldn't stomach living in a multi million dollar estate across the river from that.

I voted New York.