|

07-27-2007, 06:27 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
206 posts, read 188,064 times
Reputation: 79
|
|
City with Best Mass transit?
I know Portland OR is up there, also NYC, any others?
|
|

07-27-2007, 06:30 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Colorado Springs,CO
1,958 posts, read 2,462,127 times
Reputation: 362
|
|
|
Cleveland and Chicago are good from what I've seen.
|
|

07-28-2007, 03:26 AM
|
|
There's beauty in the solace of not giving a damn.
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
16,436 posts, read 13,062,993 times
Reputation: 4753
|
|
Chicago's would be great if it weren't rotting into the ground and in need of 5 billion dollars' worth of capital improvements.
I also wish Chicago would consider implementing some bus-only lanes. When buses are stuck in the same gridlock as all the rest of the traffic, it sure takes a lot of the convenience out of using mass transit. If it's gonna take me forever to get somewhere, I might as well spend that forever in the comfort of my own car instead of stuffed into a rolling can with 93 other schlubs like we're in a cattle-car to Auschwitz.
|
|

07-28-2007, 10:35 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
611 posts, read 892,642 times
Reputation: 64
|
|
|
NYC's subway is nice, but every so often they have technical problems with them, if it's a bomb, or something else. Chicago has a nice transit.
|
|

07-28-2007, 10:37 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
4,316 posts, read 3,720,629 times
Reputation: 1100
|
|
|
I know it is only temporary, but I would like Chicago's much better if they weren't closing my subway stop on the weekends to fix the rotting tracks (at least they are fixing them now). Nor am I a fan of trying to squeeze onto a bus that is so crowded that I don't even need to hold onto anything to be forced to stand upright because all the other people are holding me in place.
That being said, it is pretty good for a US city. By world standards it is a joke.
|
|

07-28-2007, 10:40 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
611 posts, read 892,642 times
Reputation: 64
|
|
|
chicago's transits nice, but now that I remember one of their trains slammed into something, it was pretty crazy. I wasn't on it, but I read it in the newspaper.
|
|

07-28-2007, 10:55 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Washington D.C. by way of Texas. Maybe Chicago next year
4,670 posts, read 2,673,613 times
Reputation: 1026
|
|
|
I think Metro for Washington DC is pretty good.
|
|

07-28-2007, 01:01 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
117 posts, read 158,364 times
Reputation: 33
|
|
|
Except for going downtown, I rarely use public transportation in Chicago. Most of the major cities in the East Coast such NYC, Boston, Philly, DC have decent transportation options.On the West Coast, I would have to say that Portland,SF and Seattle have good transportation options as well.
|
|

07-28-2007, 01:38 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
4,316 posts, read 3,720,629 times
Reputation: 1100
|
|
|
chitown68m - I've used public transportation in Chicago for most everything for over 11 years (even when I had a car). Depending on where you live, it is really pretty good (I live just south of wicker park so I've got plenty of options on how to get around).
|
|

07-28-2007, 03:42 PM
|
|
Deposed Military Dictator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In exile, plotting my coup
2,415 posts, read 3,891,044 times
Reputation: 1146
|
|
|
New York is hands down the best in terms of mass transit. I would say the other larger Eastern cities rank somewhere behind it, places like Boston, Philadelphia, DC and Chicago all of which have large subway, commuter train and bus networks.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|