Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should we have states anymore?
Yes 60 59.41%
No 41 40.59%
Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-07-2011, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,301,334 times
Reputation: 13293

Advertisements

We need states.

"Everything's bigger in 'the south central part of the country between Beaumont and El PAso.'"

Doesn't sound right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-07-2011, 12:27 PM
 
33 posts, read 44,025 times
Reputation: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
No, if anything states should get more power, as a large country people in different regions need different needs,
Why can't the federal government or a system of metropolitan ran city-state like areas do it?

Some states are already too large to be viable as units. You can't say that a state like California, which has many different areas with completely different needs. Why not break it up or let the feds run it?

Or an area like the Northeast, where everything is relatively small and needs multiple states to get along to coordinate policy. Why not consolidate the region so that working together will be easier?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2011, 12:31 PM
 
14,020 posts, read 15,011,523 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysteriousRegion View Post
Why can't the federal government or a system of metropolitan ran city-state like areas do it?

Some states are already too large to be viable as units. You can't say that a state like California, which has many different areas with completely different needs. Why not break it up or let the feds run it?

Or an area like the Northeast, where everything is relatively small and needs multiple states to get along to coordinate policy. Why not consolidate the region so that working together will be easier?
No Rhode Island for example is differant from Massachusetts, and anyway when they need to work together they do ex. MBTA extends to TF Green Airport.
Also if the Feds cant manage the country the way it is how will they Micro- manage the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2011, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Central Connecticut
576 posts, read 1,218,697 times
Reputation: 205
I really think we need to abolished the Feds
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2011, 02:28 PM
 
16,696 posts, read 29,515,591 times
Reputation: 7666
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysteriousRegion View Post
I just realized the poll and thread title are asking two different things.

The original question should be "Should we abolish state lines"

I meant to vote yes. Damn!

You should ask the moderators to close this poll/thread, and then redo another one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2011, 05:21 PM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,603,780 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysteriousRegion View Post
I just realized the poll and thread title are asking two different things.

The original question should be "Should we abolish state lines"
I meant to vote yes. Damn!
How do you propose we "abolish" state-lines? And who is this "we" which should be vested with the power to do it? And what do "we" re-name this new country? Simply "America"...? Also, what about that pesky "Constitution of the United States" which mentions the the individual states extensively and is devoted to the idea of a Federal Republic? Along those lines, will the 9th and 10th Ammendments of the Bill of Rights be eliminated since they give all powers not specifically delegated to the federal government to the states (and people)?

This is ridiculous....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2011, 05:23 PM
 
Location: earth?
7,284 posts, read 12,924,187 times
Reputation: 8956
Yes, we should have states and some states need to be split into even more states (i.e., Northern and Southern California).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2011, 05:30 PM
 
Location: Southeast Arizona
3,378 posts, read 5,008,559 times
Reputation: 2463
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasReb View Post
How do you propose we "abolish" state-lines? And who is this "we" which should be vested with the power to do it? And what do "we" re-name this new country? Simply "America"...? Also, what about that pesky "Constitution of the United States" which mentions the the individual states extensively and is devoted to the idea of a Federal Republic? Along those lines, will the 9th and 10th Ammendments of the Bill of Rights be eliminated since they give all powers not specifically delegated to the federal government to the states (and people)?

This is ridiculous....
Reb! You mis-voted, you put "no" on having states!

But other than that, yes you are right.

The STATES made the Union, not the other way around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2011, 05:36 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,147,443 times
Reputation: 46680
Hell no. Every state and region is different. Different cultures, different economies, different climates, and different priorities. Part of the genius of this country is that individual regions and states have some degree of autonomy in the decisions and the priorities they make. A one-size-fits-all solution would be a disaster. For example, the South continues to economically grow at a much faster relative to the rest of the country, the result of any number of decisions Southern states have made over the past several decades in terms of priorities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2011, 05:45 PM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,603,780 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert kid View Post
Reb! You mis-voted, you put "no" on having states!

But other than that, yes you are right.

The STATES made the Union, not the other way around.
Ohhhhh, NOOOOOO! IRONY INTENDED!

You are right, DK. I voted according to the thread heading, not the wording of the actual poll!

I hope this one might be started again! Ridiculous as the whole concept is, it seems others made the same mistake I did! Thanks for the heads up, DK!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top