Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-28-2012, 11:32 PM
 
66 posts, read 286,777 times
Reputation: 36

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by daschmit View Post
Many of the most spectacular landscapes in the American West owe their rugged profiles not only to glaciation but also to their comparative youth. The Tetons, for example, are believed to be only 9 million years old (Geology of the Grand Teton area - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) and the current uplift of the Cascades began ca. 8 million years ago. The major volcanic peaks in the Cascades are even younger, having begun to rise within the last 1.6 million years (Geology of the Pacific Northwest - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ). By contrast, the Laramide Orogeny, which was the catalyst to formation of the Rockies, began in the Late Cretaceous, some 70 million years ago (Laramide orogeny - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ).
Thats true when the uwharries stood at twenty thousand feet there were no rocky mountain range(uwharries are supposed to be the oldest mountain range in the world now only stand at 1,000ft
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2012, 12:37 AM
 
50 posts, read 141,419 times
Reputation: 46
Another previously unmentioned mountain range which fully meets the criteria of "high, wild and rugged" is the Wind Rivers of western Wyoming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
6,288 posts, read 11,774,262 times
Reputation: 3369
Quote:
Originally Posted by TohobitPeak View Post
I do feel amongst all of the Rocky Mountain states, that Idaho has some of the finest mountain scenery and has the most lush and green mountains of all of the USA Rocky states which makes sense because Idaho is the most forested of the USA Rocky States. The spine that forms the state line of Idaho and Montana is amazing. The Idaho side is more moist while the Montana side is dryer.
The first time I camped in Idaho was along the Lochsa river, probably about 20 miles west of the Montana Border in the Bitterroot mountains (northern Idaho.) Very humid. We woke up in the morning and although the outside temperature was about 55 degrees we still saw our breath on the air, something that doesn't happen at all in Colorado if the temperature is above the 30s. Another thing that grabbed my attention was the noticeably different set of vegetation compared to the drier Rockies of the southwest. Up in the Bitterroot there are lots of ferns and moss, and the pine needles are large, flat and waxy ... kind of "rubbery." I was impressed with the number of raging streams and rivers. We were there in July after a record snowfall year, and these creeks were everywhere, all pouring into the Lochsa, which is a huge river (by Colorado standards) and which, it turned out, is but a tributary of the Clearwater river.

Later in that same trip, we backpacked in the Sawtooth mountains. Those were drier and reminded me more of Colorado in terms of their landscape and vegetation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skihikeclimb View Post
LOL the Canadian rockies are far superior
I prefer to hike any day in mosquito-free bug-free Colorado.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbear182 View Post
The only mts. in Colorado worth a s*** are the San Juans. The rest are just rounded/flat tops and not much to look at.
Be fair. Yeah the San Juans are great, but so is the Holy Cross Wilderness near Aspen and I'm partial to north-central Colorado. There's plenty of places in Colorado where you can have a hiking experience where you'll run into at most three or four other pairs of hikers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 05:00 PM
 
620 posts, read 1,746,146 times
Reputation: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by daschmit View Post
Another previously unmentioned mountain range which fully meets the criteria of "high, wild and rugged" is the Wind Rivers of western Wyoming.
I thought the Wind River range was part of the rockies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 05:29 PM
 
50 posts, read 141,419 times
Reputation: 46
They are; we simply have not referenced the Wind Rivers previously in this discussion of spectacular alpine landscapes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 05:39 PM
 
637 posts, read 1,026,223 times
Reputation: 555
Click image for larger version

Name:	aaafairmont_chateau_lake_louise.jpg
Views:	1096
Size:	47.7 KB
ID:	90400

Click image for larger version

Name:	aaajasper-park-spirit-island-.jpg
Views:	773
Size:	40.0 KB
ID:	90401

Click image for larger version

Name:	aaaMount_Robson_08122005.jpg
Views:	1422
Size:	103.3 KB
ID:	90402

Click image for larger version

Name:	aaamtfryatt.jpg
Views:	2199
Size:	86.6 KB
ID:	90403

Click image for larger version

Name:	bcbugaboos_featured.jpg
Views:	2379
Size:	38.4 KB
ID:	90404

Click image for larger version

Name:	bcMountAssiniboine.jpg
Views:	12406
Size:	123.7 KB
ID:	90405


Canadian Rockies all the way!
US Rockies are tame in comparison
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2012, 05:47 PM
 
637 posts, read 1,026,223 times
Reputation: 555
Click image for larger version

Name:	albertaramparts.jpg
Views:	8778
Size:	136.4 KB
ID:	90406


Last but not least "The Ramparts", Tonquin valley, Jasper National Park Alberta

Try to climb those without a rope
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2012, 09:40 PM
 
Location: Østenfor sol og vestenfor måne
17,916 posts, read 24,336,832 times
Reputation: 39037
That picture in post #3 is of Sierra Blanca in the Sacramento Mts. of southern New Mexico, a range which is part of the Rio Grande Rift, not the Rockies.

As far as a lot of people generalizing all western U.S. mountains as the Rockies just means a lot of people are wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 09:36 AM
 
620 posts, read 1,746,146 times
Reputation: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQConvict View Post
That picture in post #3 is of Sierra Blanca in the Sacramento Mts. of southern New Mexico, a range which is part of the Rio Grande Rift, not the Rockies.

As far as a lot of people generalizing all western U.S. mountains as the Rockies just means a lot of people are wrong.
Agreed. The generalization is so far off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Valdez, Alaska
2,758 posts, read 5,284,996 times
Reputation: 2806
Quote:
Originally Posted by skihikeclimb View Post
and the other pic at the top right corner is Denali in Alaska (Brooks Range).
Alaska Range. Brooks Range is quite a bit further north.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top