Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What pace of city life do you prefer out of these three?
1. The fast paced, hustle and bustle, don't have time, rat race (like NYC, Boston, Philly)
2. The mixed one, with some hustle and bustle and also being laid back (Chicago, Los Angeles, Miami)
3. The totally laid back one, where you say "What's the rush?" (like San Diego, New Orleans, Honolulu).
fast pace, then in the middle of nowhere serene for vacation. Give me all or nothing. I would say the perfect combo would be Manhattan, then have a cozy place little time share shack in the FL Keys or around Santa Barbara.
I love fast paced cities, but I prefer to live somewhat outside in a suburb. Live maybe 15 minutes out of the city so I can have a full yard and a pool and a place to relax.. and then live close to a large city with all of the great attractions of a city.
I did the high rise thing.. its cool to live in them but it just isn't how I want to always live. Plus I love driving. I did however choose fast paced because I would go crazy if I was in a suburb that wasn't apart of a big city.
To visit (at least 1 week): fast paced
To visit (not longer than a week): laid back
To live: in the middle
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
