Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-04-2012, 01:24 AM
 
2,781 posts, read 7,207,400 times
Reputation: 873

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by peninsular View Post
As far as I know, Portland, OR, comes the closest in the US to fitting this pattern. West Hills, which are very close to downtown, is the wealthiest area of the entire metro.
Lake Oswego, West Linn, etc.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-04-2012, 01:49 PM
 
Location: DC
528 posts, read 1,184,459 times
Reputation: 297
DC! the eastern Maryland suburbs are much poorer than the western half of DC at least.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2013, 04:49 PM
 
28 posts, read 38,463 times
Reputation: 35
I think that in general suburban areas remain more prosperous than most inner city areas, but there are some notable exceptions in both cases. I do think if energy prices rise quickly that cities will grow more prosperous and suburban locations will become poorer. I believe that this is already starting to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2013, 06:39 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,836 posts, read 25,102,289 times
Reputation: 19060
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Around View Post
The only one I can think of is San Francisco. But as the other poster said, there are rich suburbs and poor suburbs in the bay area. The city, however, is overall considerably rich, unlike most other US cities.
Santa Clara, San Mateo, and Marin are wealthier (median income) than San Francisco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2013, 11:54 PM
 
2,253 posts, read 3,718,834 times
Reputation: 1018
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malloric View Post
Santa Clara, San Mateo, and Marin are wealthier (median income) than San Francisco.
Suburbs far fewer one-person households, so comparing HH income for cities and suburbs is a bit of an apples and oranges comparison.

Per capita income:

Marin $53,000
San Francisco $45,478
San Mateo $43,958
Santa Clara $39,804

California locations by per capita income - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:54 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top